Archive

Archive for the ‘polyamory’ Category

MEET THE NEW POLYGAMY — Or, Perhaps, the New Patriarchy?

February 18th, 2015 Comments off

by Jennifer Johnson

This article was first published at Clash Daily on February 15, 2015.

Did you see this article in the Hollywood Reporter?

23 Hollywood Moms with Same Sperm Donor and One Crazy Vacation

It gives a glowing account of 23 Hollywood moms who have used the same sperm donor to conceive children. Given the growing acceptance of sperm donation, I think it’s time we talk about the archaic, polygamous family structure that sperm donation is resurrecting. First I will show what this ancient family structure looks like by drawing from a well known historical reference and creating a diagram of it. Then I will show how the “new” family structure resembles the old when both are rendered according to genetic ties. Then I will compare these with the monogamous natural family structure. Read more…

Print Friendly

I had Masha Gessen’s dream of five parents… and it sucked

June 25th, 2014 Comments off
Around March of 2013 I came across the words of a prominent LGBT activist named Masha Gessen:
I have three kids who have five parents, more or less, and I don’t see why they shouldn’t have five parents legally… I would like to live in a legal system that is capable of reflecting that reality, and I don’t think that’s compatible with the institution of marriage.

 

Imagine having five parents! Here’s what it means: it means going back and forth between all those households on a regular basis, never having a single place to call home during your most tender and vulnerable years. It means having divided Christmases, other holidays, and birthdays–you spend one with one parent, and another with the other parent, never spending a single holiday or birthday with both parents. Imagine having each of your parents completely ignore the other half of you, the other half of your family, as if it did not even exist. Meanwhile, imagine each parent pouring their energy into their new families and creating a unified home for their new children. These experiences give you the definite impression of being something leftover, something not quite part of them. You live like that on a daily basis for 18+ years.

Does this look like a fun way to spend your childhood?

As a child, would you choose a family structure advocated by Masha Gessen? Does this look fun?

 

I don’t have to imagine, because I had five parents. I had five parents because my mom and dad divorced when I was about three; my mom remarried once and my dad remarried twice. So I had a mom and two step-moms, and a dad and one step-dad. In this day and age children can already have five parents. That’s how badly marriage has deteriorated already. The main difference between what Gessen advocates and my experience is that my step parents were not legal parents; she advocates for all of the adults in her situation to be legal parents.

Read more…

Print Friendly

A handout for queer non-monogamists

June 13th, 2014 Comments off

by CAROLYN MOYNIHAN

It is getting harder week by week to deny that acceptance of same-sex “marriage” creates a precedent for social and legal recognition of other types of sexual relationships. The Auckland Council, a ratepayer funded local authority in New Zealand, where same-sex marriage was legalised last year, has given a small handout for an event promoting polyamory, Family First reports. Read more…

Print Friendly
Categories: polyamory Tags:

ABC Wonders if ‘Polyamory’ Trumps Traditional Marriage

December 9th, 2013 Comments off

by William Bigelow

First the mainstream media championed gay marriage; now they are clearly out to destroy traditional marriage with a vengeance.

On Monday, ABC News decided to publicize a movement known as polyamory, meaning people bedding down with multiple romantic and sexual partners as a legitimate relationship. Co-anchor Dan Harris said, “Just for a minute, let’s do a thought experiment. Let’s set aside all of the emotion and consider whether the evangelists for open marriage might have a point.” Read more…

Print Friendly
Categories: polyamory Tags:

Ah, the slippery slope

August 12th, 2013 Comments off

Anita Wagner Illig, a long-time polyamory spokeswoman, told Newsweek that the Supreme Court’s DOMA decision was opening new doors: “A favorable outcome for marriage equality is a favorable outcome for multi-partner marriage, because the opposition cannot argue lack of precedent for legalizing marriage for other forms of non-traditional relationships.” Read more…

Print Friendly
Categories: polyamory, Polygamy Tags: ,

Will polyamory follow same-sex marriage?

August 7th, 2013 Comments off

by Michael Cook

The reasoning is the same; the rewards are the same. Why not?
When the Supreme Court struck down section 3 in the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in US v Windsor in June, same-sex marriage was not the only beneficiary. The decision seems to have given fresh impetus to polyamory as well. Read more…
Print Friendly
Categories: polyamory Tags:

Unconventional marriages may be legal next

August 7th, 2013 Comments off

by Dennis Byrne

“Polyamory advocate: Gay marriage ‘blazing the marriage equality trail.’” (U.S. News & World Report headline, June 24)

“Will polyamory come out of the closet next?” (PolicyMic headline, June 24)

“Polyamory”: noun. Having more than one sexual loving relationship at the same time, with the full knowledge and consent of all partners involved. Read more…

Print Friendly
Categories: polyamory Tags:

The Big Same Sex Marriage Lie

June 13th, 2013 Comments off

Such a great, logical article, I had to post the whole thing, but it came from here.

by Ryan T. Anderson

Same-sex marriage will never be widely accepted in America for a simple reason: It’s based on a lie. But don’t take my word on this; leading LGBT scholars and activists say as much. Read more…

Print Friendly

Marry Me. And Me.

June 13th, 2013 Comments off

See what a mess you have once the door is open?

Robert A. J. Gagnon  says

Another point that I have been making for 15 years: Societal endorsement of homosexual relationships will promote polyamory. Eliminate a male-female requirement, the foundation for the natural “twoness” of the sexual bond, and don’t be surprised to see polyamory on the rise. Unlike Slate, though, I was not promoting that outcome.

The case for polyamory. And while we’re at it, let’s privatize marriage. Read more…

Print Friendly
Categories: polyamory Tags:

Many Unitarians would prefer that their polyamory activists keep quiet

April 22nd, 2013 Comments off

By

The joke about Unitarians is that they’re where you go when you don’t know where to go. Theirs is the religion of last resort for the intermarried, the ambivalent, the folks who want a faith community without too many rules. It is perhaps no surprise that the Unitarian Universalist Association is one of the fastest-growing denominations in the country, ballooning 15 percent over the past decade, when other established churches were shrinking. Politically progressive to its core, it draws from the pool of people who might otherwise be “nones” – unaffiliated with any church at all.

But within the ranks of the UUA over the past few years, there has been some quiet unrest concerning a small but activist group that vociferously supports polyamory. That is to say “the practice of loving and relating intimately to more than one other person at a time,” according to a mission statement by Unitarian Universalists for Polyamory Awareness (UUPA). The UUPA “encourages spiritual wholeness regarding polyamory,” including the right of polyamorous people to have their unions blessed by a minister. Read more…

Print Friendly