About

February 9th, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments

  1. November 11th, 2009 at 09:37 | #1

    just discovered this blog!!! this is great.. so needed. getting ready to write my first book!!! — “The Genius of Woman: Time, Touch, and Talk” — what do you think? mary

  2. August 7th, 2010 at 14:54 | #2

    Wow. That’s all I can say. This website is full of bigotry and hate towards gays and those who divorce for whatever reason. I believe in my freedom of speech as well as yours, so I believe you have a right to say whatever you want. I just think your arguments brought for on this sight are poorly founded and are based on little or no logic whatsoever.

  3. Faith
    August 11th, 2010 at 18:13 | #3

    This website makes me sad. It’s so full of hate!

  4. Gay/Proud/Paul
    August 14th, 2010 at 18:00 | #4

    You make a lot of good points on your website…if one is looking for good reasons to discriminate. You’re “experts” on gay issues all have a history of writings that condemn homosexuality…so where is the impartial opinion or study? The studies are done by associates of The Ruth Institute…with fabricated outcomes to suit your own needs. NOM is a perfect example of your associations and of course they are bigots such as yourself.
    So, hey…let’s get together, have a bigot party…and come up with fabricated numbers to make everyone else look like pagans.
    You “Ruthies” have a good time together…it’s HOT down there !!!

  5. Gay/Proud/Paul
    August 14th, 2010 at 18:05 | #5

    Hi Zach…
    Your right of course. They’re cookies, cut from the same ugly mold as Maggie and the rest of the NOM.
    We’re going to see the day…shortly…when they’re just an after-thought.@Faith

  6. Humility
    August 17th, 2010 at 02:27 | #6

    It is disingenuous to blanket label people who disagree with you as “Haters,” that’s intolerance. Honestly, there might be some who do but most by far do not. And there has been some pretty nasty behavior on your side, documented, toward us. The people who oppose you are not willing to participate in the social engineering experiment that is “Gay marriage.” They understand the disastrous consequences for society that it would eventually produce and they forsee the loss of their free speech and religious freedom that would also surely follow. We are very concerned! Marriage is one man and one woman. Not same-sex, not polygamy, not minors, not anything else. Ultimately, one can’t change truth to fit one’s desires. I know this will probably not change your hearts but I do pray it will help you understand some of us better.

  7. Sean
    August 24th, 2010 at 21:04 | #7

    There’s no rational reason to limit marriage to dual gender couples. There are many good reasons to extend marriage rights to single gender couples. I can’t imagine why anyone would devote one minute of time trying to defend marriage exclusively for straight people.

  1. March 3rd, 2010 at 16:20 | #1
  2. March 31st, 2010 at 15:25 | #2