<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/tag/children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Daycare must focus on child, not adult needs, says new report</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/daycare-must-focus-on-child-not-adult-needs-says-new-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/daycare-must-focus-on-child-not-adult-needs-says-new-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[day care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan A new report on daycare and child wellbeing in New Zealand has had a predictably stand-offish reception from the media and professional groups so far, although parents posting their opinions online are dividedabout its claims. The report, Who Cares, published by lobby group Family First and written by British psychologist and author [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/daycare-must-focus-on-child-not-adult-needs-says-new-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About gender</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/about-gender/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/about-gender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender differences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Here&#8217;s a little food for thought about gender &#8211; a quote from a long article in Prospect magazine in which philosopher Roger Scruton reviews three books contributing to the nature-nurture debate. This quote is from a section in which he argues, against the view of the philosopher Jesse Prinz, that biology does [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/about-gender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How divorce ruins children’s lives</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/how-divorce-ruins-children%e2%80%99s-lives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/how-divorce-ruins-children%e2%80%99s-lives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by William West A new study on divorce, looking at the complete spectrum of research on the subject, confirms what most people already know – even if they are not willing to admit it: divorce causes “irreparable harm” to the whole family, but  particularly to the children. There have been plenty of individual studies exposing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/how-divorce-ruins-children%e2%80%99s-lives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More time online = less happiness among girls</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/more-time-online-less-happiness-among-girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/more-time-online-less-happiness-among-girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[girls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Girls who spend a lot of time using multimedia seem are less happy and socially comfortable than peers who spend less time on screens, a study from Stanford University suggests. Researchers came to that conclusion after analysing an online survey taken by 3,400 8- to 12-year-olds. The survey was offered through Discovery [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/more-time-online-less-happiness-among-girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Lesson in how NOT to talk to a priest</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/a-lesson-in-how-not-to-talk-to-a-priest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/a-lesson-in-how-not-to-talk-to-a-priest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting is funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At my daughter’s baptism, the priest asked, “What name do you give this child?” We told him, and when the priest repeated the name, my four-year-old son pointed violently at the priest and yelled, Keep reading.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/a-lesson-in-how-not-to-talk-to-a-priest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parental Manipulation, 101</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/26/parental-manipulation-101/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/26/parental-manipulation-101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting is funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When my two-year-old daughter was throwing a fit, I took hold of her and looked her in the eyes, saying, “You WILL talk to Mommy nicely.” With no hesitation, she got three inches from my face, tilted her head to the side and said Keep reading.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/26/parental-manipulation-101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open marriage? A terrible idea for kids</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/open-marriage-a-terrible-idea-for-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/open-marriage-a-terrible-idea-for-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Radicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan US Presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich was accused by ex-wife number two last week of wanting, at one stage, an &#8220;open marriage&#8221; in order to accommodate an affair he was having with present wife (number three). The New York Times has rounded up some experts to discuss the merits of such arangements. Brad [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/open-marriage-a-terrible-idea-for-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He sings like an angel</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/19/he-sings-like-an-angel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/19/he-sings-like-an-angel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting is funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My two-year-old son was singing, or rather, belting out, the Alleluia in his best voice. The only problem was that he replaced the word “Alleluia” with&#8230; Keep reading.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/19/he-sings-like-an-angel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we free to speak about parenting research?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/are-we-free-to-speak-about-parenting-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/are-we-free-to-speak-about-parenting-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan It’s difficult today to say anything in favour of the intact, married family without putting somebody’s nose out of joint. Last week it was a blogger at the LBGT site ThinkProgress who took umbrage at a comment by Focus on the Family’s Glenn Stanton. I’ll let Mr Stanton tell you how from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/are-we-free-to-speak-about-parenting-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with lesbian parenting studies</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/17/what-undecided-voters-on-tv-and-the-parade-of-artificial-insemination-studies-have-in-common/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/17/what-undecided-voters-on-tv-and-the-parade-of-artificial-insemination-studies-have-in-common/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunking MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Michael Worley, First year law student at J. Reuben Clark Law School at Brigham Young University, and a 2011 graduate of the Ruth Institute It Takes a Family to Raise a Village program. It is common knowledge that TV reports don’t tell the whole story.  Frequently a group of 75 undecided voters gather to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/17/what-undecided-voters-on-tv-and-the-parade-of-artificial-insemination-studies-have-in-common/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to compensate for lost fertility?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/how-to-compensate-for-lost-fertility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/how-to-compensate-for-lost-fertility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[african americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forced sterilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Shannon Roberts Past Eugenics and sterilisation programs in the United States are coming back to bite them, with North Carolina currently the first State to address compensation for victims. According to the North Carolina Justice for Sterilization Victims Foundation, at one time 31 states in the United States had government-run eugenics programs. In North [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/how-to-compensate-for-lost-fertility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie morality is plummeting</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/movie-morality-is-plummeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/movie-morality-is-plummeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[popular culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualization of teens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by William West Film censors are allowing teens to access much more explicit content and few parents seem to care A time traveller from the 20th Century would very likely be shocked by how standards have plummeted in the film industry in a little over a decade – particularly with movies aimed at the teen [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/movie-morality-is-plummeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cruel genius children?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/cruel-genius-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/cruel-genius-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting is funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Random chance? Prank of the fitness gods? Yes, I know I’m getting big, but seeing this on my fridge is just spooky. See it to believe it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/cruel-genius-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Left-wing rhetorical strategies: mischaracterize your  opponents’ statements</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/10/left-wing-rhetorical-strategies-mischaracterize-your-opponents%e2%80%99-statements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/10/left-wing-rhetorical-strategies-mischaracterize-your-opponents%e2%80%99-statements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of our continuing series of posts on identifying the rhetorical tactics of the opponents of marriage. This strategy of mischaracterizing your opponents’ statements is extremely common, and takes several different forms.  Today we are going to deal with just one: being outraged over a statement you attribute to your opponent, but which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/10/left-wing-rhetorical-strategies-mischaracterize-your-opponents%e2%80%99-statements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As I was saying&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/06/as-i-was-saying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/06/as-i-was-saying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Family Research Council has caught up with the Ruth Institute. I shouldn&#8217;t gloat, but the big DC-Beltway Think Tank has just discovered the Presumption of Paternity. Out here in San Diego, as far from the Beltway as you can get and still be in the Continental US, we have been saying this stuff, literally, for years: Same-sex [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/06/as-i-was-saying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jesus speaks to little children</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/05/jesus-speaks-to-little-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/05/jesus-speaks-to-little-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting is funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When my daughter was about four, I was telling her that while we were in church everyone needs to be extra quiet. When we are, Jesus can talk to us in our hearts. And if we are quiet, we can hear Him.  She said, “Okay, Mommy,” and about a minute later she said, “Oh Mommy, I hear him.”  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/05/jesus-speaks-to-little-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Marriage Matters, Third Edition: Twenty-Six Conclusions from the Social Sciences</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/04/why-marriage-matters-third-edition-twenty-six-conclusions-from-the-social-sciences/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/04/why-marriage-matters-third-edition-twenty-six-conclusions-from-the-social-sciences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By W. Bradford Wilcox Now Available as an E-Book! Scholarly evidence continues to point to the enormous benefits of marriage to couples, children, and the society. Released by a group of eighteen family scholars, the latest edition of Why Marriage Matters offers important new findings from the social sciences on the state of marriage in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/04/why-marriage-matters-third-edition-twenty-six-conclusions-from-the-social-sciences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does raising kids decrease marital happiness?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/13/does-raising-kids-decrease-marital-happiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/13/does-raising-kids-decrease-marital-happiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happy Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan In the last post on the new State of Our Unions (SOU) report from the National Marriage Project we read that “the benefits of generosity were particularly pronounced among couples with children”. Parents who were very generous with each other were more likely to be very happy as well. But there’s more. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/13/does-raising-kids-decrease-marital-happiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex-ed classes and assault on our children&#8217;s innocence (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/sex-ed-classes-and-assault-on-our-childrens-innocence-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/sex-ed-classes-and-assault-on-our-childrens-innocence-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex ed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Michael L. Brown Caution: Contains descriptions that some may find offensive. As outrageous as it is to hear about the new sex-ed curriculum for New York City schools, beginning with middle schools, there are some school districts for which the program does not start early enough. And so, in June 2010, the Provincetown, Massachusetts, school [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/sex-ed-classes-and-assault-on-our-childrens-innocence-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-Sex Marriage: Putting Every Household at Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/same-sex-marriage-putting-every-household-at-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/same-sex-marriage-putting-every-household-at-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who cares about the future of our society should read this book. Children are among those most affected by same-sex marriage. This book discusses the impact same-sex marriage has on the culture and gives you real answers to the central questions surrounding this important issue. Read the book review and find ordering information or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/same-sex-marriage-putting-every-household-at-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/17 queries in 0.064 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-10 20:08:37 -->
