<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; artificial reproduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/tag/artificial-reproduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:23:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Daddy Was Only a Donor</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/19/daddy-was-only-a-donor-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/19/daddy-was-only-a-donor-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm donors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By W. BRADFORD WILCOX
In &#8220;The Switch,&#8221; coming later this summer, Jennifer Aniston plays an attractive 40-year-old professional who has given up on finding Mr. Right for marriage and decides instead to move straight on to motherhood with a donor father. The movie offers a largely celebratory treatment of donor insemination, as do two other movies [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/19/daddy-was-only-a-donor-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I’m the Only Daddy You Got! I’m the Paterfamilias!</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/02/19/i%e2%80%99m-the-only-daddy-you-got-i%e2%80%99m-the-paterfamilias/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/02/19/i%e2%80%99m-the-only-daddy-you-got-i%e2%80%99m-the-paterfamilias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 23:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fatherless children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm donors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article by a Ruth Institute Academic Advisory Board Member.
By Jennifer Lahl, CBC National Director
Newsweek recently reported a story about a 51-year-old man, who between 1980 and 1994 donated his sperm twice a week in order to make cash for medical school and to nurture his altruistic desires to help infertile women. Kirk Maxey states, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/02/19/i%e2%80%99m-the-only-daddy-you-got-i%e2%80%99m-the-paterfamilias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Artificial Reproduction Quiz</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/02/08/artificial-reproduction-quiz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/02/08/artificial-reproduction-quiz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What percentage of Artificial Reproductive Technology patients are married couples, and what percentage are unmarried women?
A. The vast majority of ART patients, about 75%, are married couples.
B. It is split about evenly between married and unmarried women.
C. It is evenly split three ways: about a third married women, about a third partnered lesbians and about [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/02/08/artificial-reproduction-quiz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US IVF clinic scandals come to light</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/10/14/us-ivf-clinic-scandals-come-to-light/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/10/14/us-ivf-clinic-scandals-come-to-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Cook  BioEdge
While the mistakes of British fertility clinics are going to be placed on a public register, in the US lawsuits are needed to bring them to light. Two scandals have been in the news in the last couple of weeks.
In New Orleans, Ochsner Hospital has shut the doors of its IVF clinic because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/10/14/us-ivf-clinic-scandals-come-to-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK watchdog to disclose IVF errors</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/10/08/uk-watchdog-to-disclose-ivf-errors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/10/08/uk-watchdog-to-disclose-ivf-errors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Michael Cook
From now on serious mistakes in UK IVF clinics can be scrutinised by the public. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority says that it will post inspection reports on its website in an effort to make fertility treatment more transparent. The reports will include the name of the clinic involved, brief details of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/10/08/uk-watchdog-to-disclose-ivf-errors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethics of paying for test-tube babies</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/09/30/ethics-of-paying-for-test-tube-babies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/09/30/ethics-of-paying-for-test-tube-babies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designer baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test-tube babies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Margaret Somerville
If society pays the costs for creating test-tube babies, we also have to accept the ethical responsibility.
The Ontario Expert Panel on Infertility and Adoption recently released its report, titled &#8220;Raising Expectations,&#8221; which describes the current state of Ontario&#8217;s adoption and assisted reproduction systems and makes detailed recommendations. 
There is much to praise in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/09/30/ethics-of-paying-for-test-tube-babies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.038 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2010-07-30 21:29:56 -->