<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; Same Sex Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/category/same-sex-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:23:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Revisiting the Iowa case, for the benefit of G-A-Y</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/29/revisiting-the-iowa-case-for-the-benefit-of-g-a-y/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/29/revisiting-the-iowa-case-for-the-benefit-of-g-a-y/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[NOM Summer Marriage Tour 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOM Summer Marriage tour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome readers from the Good As You site. I just wanted to clarify for all of you the fact that I have indeed read the Iowa decision, Varnum v Brien. I believe it was wrongly decided and poorly argued. I have written about it in two separate places, which are now posted on the Ruth [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/29/revisiting-the-iowa-case-for-the-benefit-of-g-a-y/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage and the Reign of Judges</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/marriage-and-the-reign-of-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/marriage-and-the-reign-of-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Matthew J. Franck
The latest decision from our judicial overlords on same-sex marriage spells trouble for republican constitutionalism and the institution of marriage.
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was grounded on a fear of judges run amok. This past Thursday, federal district court judge Joseph Tauro of Boston justified this fear when he struck down [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/marriage-and-the-reign-of-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If any of you know Spanish, this is from Argentina</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/if-any-of-you-know-spanish-this-is-from-argentina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/if-any-of-you-know-spanish-this-is-from-argentina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding their July 13 Argentines for the Children demonstration before the Argentinian Congress was to vote on traditional marriage: &#8220;The demonstration gathered 60000 people in a very cold day. Some others estimation spoke about 130000, but we think the first one is the correct one. It was plenty of families, young people and old, all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/if-any-of-you-know-spanish-this-is-from-argentina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we can&#8217;t talk&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/19/why-we-cant-talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/19/why-we-cant-talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlemagne1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fifty years ago, if you were to say that the definition of marriage should be expanded to include the union of two men or two women, you would have gotten some strange looks.
Nowadays, if you say that the definition of marriage should NOT be changed, you are immoral.  Strangely, you are NOT immoral if you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/19/why-we-cant-talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News Coverage in NH</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/17/news-coverage-in-nh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/17/news-coverage-in-nh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 03:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOM Summer Marriage Tour 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the news coverage of the NOM rally in NH got my quote right, but got my name wrong. Oh well.  I could have easily straightened him out, if he had asked. 

Dr. Ruth Roback, who heads the NOM-financed Ruth Institute, challenged the view that same-sex marriage does not degrade the lives of heterosexual couples.
Once [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/17/news-coverage-in-nh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Argentines Rally for Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/argentines-rally-for-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/argentines-rally-for-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This story in the Buenos Aires Herald reports on the groups rallying for natural marriage, but it doesn&#8217;t give an estimate of the crowd.  We&#8217;ll have to rely on our friends on the ground there, to let us know their estimates of the numbers of people there.  As in the US, this cause [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/argentines-rally-for-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RI Statement in Support of Argentina</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/ri-statement-in-support-of-argentina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/ri-statement-in-support-of-argentina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Congress of Argentina will be voting on Same Sex Marriage tomorrow, Wednesday, July 14th. Today, supporters of natural marriage will hold a major rally in Buenos Aires. The lower house of the Argentine Congress approved a same sex marriage bill in May: now the measure goes to their Senate. The coalition supporting natural marriage [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/ri-statement-in-support-of-argentina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jaw-Dropping Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/jaw-dropping-hypocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/jaw-dropping-hypocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlemagne1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenth Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Government can push the states around.  It can impose medicare, medicaid, Obamacare, and any other ruinous boondoggle it sees fit.  Why?  Because the Tenth Amendment doesn&#8217;t matter.
But, oh.  What about the Defense of Marriage Act?  Gasp! The Federal Government is not allowed to push the states around!  That&#8217;s absolutely forbidden!  Didn&#8217;t they ever [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/jaw-dropping-hypocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government Neutrality in Marriage is (probably) Not Possible</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/08/government-neutrality-in-marriage-is-probably-not-possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/08/government-neutrality-in-marriage-is-probably-not-possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am responding to the inquiry of a student who wanted to know, in effect, whether it would be desirable to somehow get the government out of the marriage business altogether.  Couldn’t we sidestep a lot of the conflict over marriage, by eliminating the default relationship contract currently known as marriage, and allowing any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/08/government-neutrality-in-marriage-is-probably-not-possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Patriot on Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/08/gay-patriot-on-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/08/gay-patriot-on-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlemagne1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of our readers are shocked that we quote people with whom we have some disagreements.
Well, it&#8217;s time for them to be shocked again.
Because right now I&#8217;m about to quote Gay Patriot on the topic of Gay Marriage.  I may be mistaken, but I think that Mr. Patriot is somewhat in favor of it.  But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/08/gay-patriot-on-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Outward Appeal of Privatizing Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/02/the-outward-appeal-of-privatizing-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/02/the-outward-appeal-of-privatizing-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before I go any further in my responses to my young friend who asked about privatizing marriage, I want to acknowledge one thing: this proposal is outwardly appealling. I recently received an e-mail from an earnest young man, who wanted my opinion of his proposal to essentially privatize marriage. His idea was to have government [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/02/the-outward-appeal-of-privatizing-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Privatizing Marriage? Part 1. Marriage Equality is Impossible</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/02/privatizing-marriage-part-1-marriage-equality-is-impossible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/02/privatizing-marriage-part-1-marriage-equality-is-impossible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 22:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1. in a series of responses to a question posed by a student. 
No one contract can treat same sex couples and opposite sex couples identically.
(Warning: this post is long! But Worth the effort if I do say so myself!)
1.	If you believed that it is not possible for the government to be neutral in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/02/privatizing-marriage-part-1-marriage-equality-is-impossible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Broken Confirmation Process</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/01/our-broken-confirmation-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/01/our-broken-confirmation-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ralph Reed declares our Supreme Court Confirmation process to be broken and he is certainly correct. The question is why?
The answer is one word: abortion.  Actually, it is abortion and all its ill-begotten progeny, the entire sexual revolution. This is because the abortion rights fanatics are attempting to create something that simply cannot be: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/01/our-broken-confirmation-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Libertarian View of Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/01/a-libertarian-view-of-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/01/a-libertarian-view-of-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, I didn&#8217;t write it.  Someone who calls herself Jane Galt wrote it. It is really, really good. I will just quote the beginning. You should really read the whole thing. Here goes: 
A really, really, really long post about gay marriage that does not, in the end, support one side or the otherUnlike [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/01/a-libertarian-view-of-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get the government out of the marriage business?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/01/get-the-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/01/get-the-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear this proposal frequently. &#8220;Get the government out of marriage&#8221; has become the new default position for alot of people. (I suspect for some folks, this position is really a way to get the same sex marriage issue to go away. I don&#8217;t think that will work, but that is another story.)  
I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/01/get-the-government-out-of-the-marriage-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: Liar or Bigot?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/30/obama-liar-or-bigot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/30/obama-liar-or-bigot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Princeton University professor Robby George tells it like is today on NRO. 
It has become a matter of orthodoxy among progressives that those who believe that marriage is properly defined as the union of one man and one woman are guilty of bigotry.
There is a problem, however: Barack Obama has assured voters that he believes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/30/obama-liar-or-bigot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-Sex Marriage and Formal Discrimination</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/same-sex-marriage-and-formal-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/same-sex-marriage-and-formal-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by David Schaengold
Another reason the analogy between same-sex marriage and interracial marriage fails.
Recently in Public Discourse, Francis Beckwith argued that the frequently invoked analogy between same-sex marriage and interracial marriage is flawed, and should not be used by advocates for the legal recognition of same-sex unions. As Beckwith wrote, this analogy is freighted with enormous [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/same-sex-marriage-and-formal-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage on trial</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/19/marriage-on-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/19/marriage-on-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Might as well post this as well.
by Sheila Liaugminas
Sometimes, the Proposition 8 battle seems surreal. But then, so do other serious, emotional and intense conflicts playing out in the nation’s courts and city halls and classrooms and media, over what we knew not long ago as core Judeo-Christian traditional values.
The closing argument by Prop 8 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/19/marriage-on-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaos and Non Sequitur</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/11/chaos-and-non-sequitur/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/11/chaos-and-non-sequitur/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlemagne1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our Lefty opponents criticize our arguments saying that they are a non sequitur.  Recently, for instance, I argued that the denigration of traditional marriage including  by means of redefinition may contribute to fatherlessness.  I then showed that fatherlessness has contributed to the social disorder in the American and British underclasses.  I argue that it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/11/chaos-and-non-sequitur/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public school bus driver calls student &#8217;stupid little bigot&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/04/public-school-bus-driver-calls-student-stupid-little-bigot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/04/public-school-bus-driver-calls-student-stupid-little-bigot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marrige]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s something that came to my email from American Family Association (AFA). Read the article then tell me, do you think things would have been different if the rolls were reversed? That is, if the bus driver were the one speaking negatively against gays? My guess would be instant termination. Yours? 
School refuses to take any action to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/04/public-school-bus-driver-calls-student-stupid-little-bigot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/17 queries in 0.047 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2010-07-30 21:50:11 -->