<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; family</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/category/family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>About gender</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/about-gender/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/about-gender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender differences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Here&#8217;s a little food for thought about gender &#8211; a quote from a long article in Prospect magazine in which philosopher Roger Scruton reviews three books contributing to the nature-nurture debate. This quote is from a section in which he argues, against the view of the philosopher Jesse Prinz, that biology does [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/about-gender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Family in America and the Public Welfare: The Other Side of the Story</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/the-family-in-america-and-the-public-welfare-the-other-side-of-the-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/the-family-in-america-and-the-public-welfare-the-other-side-of-the-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[debunking MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Robert W. Patterson Published at philly.com on February 5, 2012. During the last few weeks, the Inquirer and Daily News have had a field day with the journal I edit, The Family in America, deploying scorn, ridicule, and caricature to depict me as an “extremist” unworthy of a political appointment at the Pennsylvania Department [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/the-family-in-america-and-the-public-welfare-the-other-side-of-the-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr J testifies on Civil Marriage and Domestic Partnerships</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/24/dr-j-testifies-on-civil-marriage-and-domestic-partnerships/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/24/dr-j-testifies-on-civil-marriage-and-domestic-partnerships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/24/dr-j-testifies-on-civil-marriage-and-domestic-partnerships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we free to speak about parenting research?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/are-we-free-to-speak-about-parenting-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/are-we-free-to-speak-about-parenting-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan It’s difficult today to say anything in favour of the intact, married family without putting somebody’s nose out of joint. Last week it was a blogger at the LBGT site ThinkProgress who took umbrage at a comment by Focus on the Family’s Glenn Stanton. I’ll let Mr Stanton tell you how from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/are-we-free-to-speak-about-parenting-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Percent or 33: America&#8217;s Real Inequality Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/04/one-percent-or-33-americas-real-inequality-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/04/one-percent-or-33-americas-real-inequality-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by David Paul Deavel Review of Mitch Pearlstein&#8217;s From Family Collapse to America&#8217;s Decline: The Educational, Economic, and Social Costs of Family Fragmentation (ISI, Aug 2011) ISBN: 978- 1607093626. Paperback, 165 pages; $24.95. The American economy remains sluggish and, from all over the political spectrum, particularly the left, people have turned their attention to inequality. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/04/one-percent-or-33-americas-real-inequality-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does raising kids decrease marital happiness?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/13/does-raising-kids-decrease-marital-happiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/13/does-raising-kids-decrease-marital-happiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happy Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan In the last post on the new State of Our Unions (SOU) report from the National Marriage Project we read that “the benefits of generosity were particularly pronounced among couples with children”. Parents who were very generous with each other were more likely to be very happy as well. But there’s more. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/13/does-raising-kids-decrease-marital-happiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Everybody, Including Gays, Should Support Traditional Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/03/why-everybody-including-gays-should-support-traditional-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/03/why-everybody-including-gays-should-support-traditional-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JThieme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Redefinition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think conservatives and libertarians err when they refer to &#8220;gay marriage&#8221; as such. They unwittingly concede a tremendous amount of ground when using that term. If I was on the left I would secretly be quite happy every time I saw a conservative or libertarian use it. But since I’m not on the left, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/03/why-everybody-including-gays-should-support-traditional-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Family structure’ said to trump ‘wanted’ as key to a child’s future</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/%e2%80%98family-structure%e2%80%99-said-to-trump-%e2%80%98wanted%e2%80%99-as-key-to-a-child%e2%80%99s-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/%e2%80%98family-structure%e2%80%99-said-to-trump-%e2%80%98wanted%e2%80%99-as-key-to-a-child%e2%80%99s-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Cheryl Wetzstein In the eyes of children, is it paramount that they were “planned” and “wanted”? Or does the family structure of their home matter more? These are two of the many thought-provoking questions about donor-conceived children and “diverse” family forms in a report released Thursday from the Commission on Parenthood’s Future at the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/%e2%80%98family-structure%e2%80%99-said-to-trump-%e2%80%98wanted%e2%80%99-as-key-to-a-child%e2%80%99s-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No One Invited…Mother.</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/11/no-one-invited%e2%80%a6mother/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/11/no-one-invited%e2%80%a6mother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Pia on November 10, 2011 Over the weekend, I was sifting through a pile of mail and got distracted with a Brooks Brothers catalog (pictured right). Something bothered me, but I couldn’t put my finger on it. Then I realized, this cover picture had nothing to do with a family, except perhaps a broken [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/11/no-one-invited%e2%80%a6mother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strengthening the Family: a Report from Utah</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/09/strengthening-the-family-a-report-from-utah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/09/strengthening-the-family-a-report-from-utah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charles Capps, Stanford alumnus and co-founder of the Anscombe Society at Stanford University November 9, 2011 Last weekend, a group of students and young professionals converged on Provo, Utah, for the second annual Strengthening the Family conference, put on by Students for the Family.  The conference planners selected a timely theme—“Engaging Issues with Courage [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/09/strengthening-the-family-a-report-from-utah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UN officer stresses importance of the family</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/02/un-officer-stresses-importance-of-the-family/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/02/un-officer-stresses-importance-of-the-family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Family minded people often complain, with reason, about the United Nations approach to family issues. Watch this video, though, and listen to a UN officer who seems to hit all the right notes. Renata Kaczmarska is a focal point for the United Nations Programme on the Family,  which is part of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/02/un-officer-stresses-importance-of-the-family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr J:  &#8220;..on the road again&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/27/9108/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/27/9108/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 20:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m on my way to Provo UT for the Students for the Family Symposium. I will be leaving San Diego later today, with the top of my convertible down. I wonder how far north I can go on the I-15 before I have to put the top up! I can&#8217;t wait for this conference!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/27/9108/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise of the Planet</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/27/rise-of-the-planet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/27/rise-of-the-planet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by rnewman I’d like to start off by thanking Elizabeth for inviting me to be a guest blogger. For those who don’t know me (most of you) my name is Rickard Newman, I’m a recent transplant to New York and I’m engaged to Alana S. Since I met Alana I went from knowing nothing about [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/27/rise-of-the-planet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family values remain strong in a changing world</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/family-values-remain-strong-in-a-changing-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/family-values-remain-strong-in-a-changing-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[values]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Laurie deRose Gobal data shows majority support for the traditional family, despite some erosion. In the last section of the Sustainable Demographic Development report Laurie deRose surveys global statistical evidence on international family strcuture, children’s trends, family culture, and family economic wellbeing. Here MercatorNet reproduces his findings on family culture, which are generally positive. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/family-values-remain-strong-in-a-changing-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten policies for renewing family life</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/ten-policies-for-renewing-family-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/ten-policies-for-renewing-family-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Phillip Longman The state of the family in many advanced societies is unsustainable. Which public policies could reverse this decline? &#160; In the central part of the Sustained Demographic Development report, The Empty Cradle, Phillip Longman and others track in detail the patterns of demographic decline globally and their causes. At the end, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/ten-policies-for-renewing-family-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I never should have had eight children</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/22/why-i-never-should-have-had-eight-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/22/why-i-never-should-have-had-eight-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Leila Miller October 21, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) &#8211; A few months back, I told my readers on my blog how to raise eight children without even trying. Today, I’m going to tell you why I never should have had eight children in the first place: had I listened to the devil and modern conventional wisdom, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/22/why-i-never-should-have-had-eight-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Traditional Family Values</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/18/traditional-family-values/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/18/traditional-family-values/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[values]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor&#8217;s Note: Last week my daughter, Moriah Mosher, who is 18 years old, traveled to Rhodes, Greece, where she addressed the Rhodes Youth Forum on the subject of “Traditional Family Values.” The Forum is an annual meeting of young people from all over the world who are devoted to the search for the common good. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/18/traditional-family-values/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snappy Answers for Stupid Questions About Your Big Family</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/16/snappy-answers-for-stupid-questions-about-your-big-family/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/16/snappy-answers-for-stupid-questions-about-your-big-family/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Simcha Fisher Guess what? I’m having a baby. Yes, another baby. Why? Because once you find something you’re good at, you stick with it. Congratulations are welcome! Comments of “Die now, mindless breeder” will be dealt with appropriately. My baby, God willing, is not going anywhere, whether you approve of this pregnancy or not; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/16/snappy-answers-for-stupid-questions-about-your-big-family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration wants “strong families”</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/08/obama-administration-wants-%e2%80%9cstrong-families%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/08/obama-administration-wants-%e2%80%9cstrong-families%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 22:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Programmes in the United States that promote marriage or fatherhood have received a new round of funding from the federal government &#8212; nearly $120 million, all up. The funding was begun by President George W Bush. &#8220;A strong and stable family is the greatest advantage any child can have,&#8221; George Sheldon, HHS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/08/obama-administration-wants-%e2%80%9cstrong-families%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wealth and Health of Nations</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/08/the-wealth-and-health-of-nations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/08/the-wealth-and-health-of-nations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 22:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Christopher White  Based on projections from the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA), world population will reach seven billion by the end of this month. According to Hania Zlotnik, director of DESA’s Population Division, “It is very important for the future of humanity that the young people of today have on average [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/08/the-wealth-and-health-of-nations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/21 queries in 0.025 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-10 20:48:54 -->
