<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; Artificial Reproductive Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/category/artificial-reproductive-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rethinking Sperm-Donor Anonymity: Of Changed Selves, Non-Identity, and One-Night Stands</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/rethinking-sperm-donor-anonymity-of-changed-selves-non-identity-and-one-night-stands/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/rethinking-sperm-donor-anonymity-of-changed-selves-non-identity-and-one-night-stands/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by I. Glenn Cohen Harvard Law School, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 100, p. 431, 2012, Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 11-32 Abstract: In the United States, a movement urging legally prohibiting sperm-donor anonymity is rapidly gaining steam. In her forthcoming article in this journal, The New Kinship, and in her wonderful book, Test Tube [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/rethinking-sperm-donor-anonymity-of-changed-selves-non-identity-and-one-night-stands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Precious Babies &#8211; a donor conceived person&#8217;s view</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/20/book-review-precious-babies-a-donor-conceived-persons-view/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/20/book-review-precious-babies-a-donor-conceived-persons-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Rachel Pepa [Please note the other resources at the bottom of the article when you click "Keep reading."] A review of Precious Babies: Pregnancy, Birth and Parenting after Infertility By Kate Brian As an informal guide to having children after fertility problems, Precious Babies has much to recommend it. There is, however, an omission [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/20/book-review-precious-babies-a-donor-conceived-persons-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Moms: the triumph of the Will over Nature</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/06/two-moms-the-triumph-of-the-will-over-nature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/06/two-moms-the-triumph-of-the-will-over-nature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Redefinition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw this headline in the Des Moines Register: “Judge: Put both moms’ names on the birth certificate.”  “Both moms?!?!?!”  Yes, you read it right: “both moms.” Judges created same sex “marriage” in Iowa in a case called Varnum v Brien. So, now another judge rules that the spouse in a same sex marriage should [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/06/two-moms-the-triumph-of-the-will-over-nature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IVF: Is This Really Good for the Children?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/04/2-ivf-is-this-really-good-for-the-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/04/2-ivf-is-this-really-good-for-the-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Rebecca Taylor I have heard countless times that parents that undergo in vitrofertilization (IVF) must love their children so very much to go through such an expensive and invasive process to have children.  I have no doubt that parents undergoing IVF believe they are doing what is best, but looking at the realities of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/04/2-ivf-is-this-really-good-for-the-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Marriage Equality&#8221; Creates Equality for Whom?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/marriage-equality-creates-equality-for-whom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/marriage-equality-creates-equality-for-whom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 07:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JThieme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Redefinition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The “marriage equality” movement is based on faulty logic and is not about creating “equal rights.” Leaders in the “marriage equality” movement either are not honest with their followers, or truly do not understand their own arguments. Whichever is the case, they need the concept of “marriage equality” to contain an element that is simultaneously [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/marriage-equality-creates-equality-for-whom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminists Warn Against Exploiting Women for Eggs in Biotech</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/06/feminists-warn-against-exploiting-women-for-eggs-in-biotech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/06/feminists-warn-against-exploiting-women-for-eggs-in-biotech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Wesley J. Smith Click here to watch the related music video. Pro choice and pro life women have come together in coalition to protect women from being exploited for their eggs by Big Biotech. Reason?  Women would take all the risks and the companies could make all the money but for the small payments [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/06/feminists-warn-against-exploiting-women-for-eggs-in-biotech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Everybody, Including Gays, Should Support Traditional Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/03/why-everybody-including-gays-should-support-traditional-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/03/why-everybody-including-gays-should-support-traditional-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JThieme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Redefinition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think conservatives and libertarians err when they refer to &#8220;gay marriage&#8221; as such. They unwittingly concede a tremendous amount of ground when using that term. If I was on the left I would secretly be quite happy every time I saw a conservative or libertarian use it. But since I’m not on the left, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/03/why-everybody-including-gays-should-support-traditional-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s Allowed in the Public Square? And who Gets to Decide?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/whos-allowed-in-the-public-square-and-who-gets-to-decide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/whos-allowed-in-the-public-square-and-who-gets-to-decide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 23:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[egg donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg dpnation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article was first published October 13, 2011, at cbc-network.org. By Jennifer Lahl, CBC President Despite all our society&#8217;s talk of civility these days, it seems the public square is only becoming more of a lion&#8217;s den. And people of a certain stripe are being excluded or marginalized purely on the basis of their religious [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/whos-allowed-in-the-public-square-and-who-gets-to-decide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misconceptions about a new vein of comedy</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/misconceptions-about-a-new-vein-of-comedy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/misconceptions-about-a-new-vein-of-comedy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm donors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Damian Adams Not knowing your biological father is hardly a fit topic for Hollywood slapstick. Starbuck is a new French-Canadian comedy about what happens when a sperm donor who has fathered 533 children is tracked down by over 100 of them. There is all manner of hilarious slapstick when he anonymously steps into their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/misconceptions-about-a-new-vein-of-comedy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous Father’s Day</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/anonymous-father%e2%80%99s-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/anonymous-father%e2%80%99s-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fathers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Watch the video. It&#8217;s Father&#8217;s Day again &#8212; that is, Anonymous Father&#8217;s Day, a time to become aware of what the children of donor dads think of their absent, unknown progenitors. Jennifer Lahl, President of the Center for Bioethics and Culture Network and director of Eggsploitation, now brings us Anonymous Father&#8217;s Day [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/anonymous-father%e2%80%99s-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IVF Industry&#8217;s Cavalier Attitude toward Children</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/22/ivf-industrys-cavalier-attitude-toward-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/22/ivf-industrys-cavalier-attitude-toward-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alana Stewart, Elizabeth Marquardt, Jennifer Lahl, call your offices! Check out this NPR interview with a representative of the IVF industry and Wendy Kramer, founder of one of the sibling donor registries. Listen to Sean Tipton, director of public affairs for the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of reproductive medicine practitioners. We think [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/22/ivf-industrys-cavalier-attitude-toward-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IVF Industry&#8217;s Cavalier attitude toward women&#8217;s health</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/22/ivf-industrys-cavalier-attitude-toward-womens-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/22/ivf-industrys-cavalier-attitude-toward-womens-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a  recent study of ovarian cancer &#8221;After 15 years of follow-up, they found that women who had undergone IVF were more than four times as likely those who had not to develop borderline ovarian cancer, a malignancy that is treatable and survivable.&#8221; Now, I would normally think that a four times greater risk of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/22/ivf-industrys-cavalier-attitude-toward-womens-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why ‘splitting’ motherhood is against the rights of the child</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/08/why-%e2%80%98splitting%e2%80%99-motherhood-is-against-the-rights-of-the-child/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/08/why-%e2%80%98splitting%e2%80%99-motherhood-is-against-the-rights-of-the-child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm donors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonderful! The world is coming to its senses! FROM THE IONA INSTITUTE BLOG: In the last year to 18 months the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR, pictured) had handed down several excellent decisions. The most famous is the Lautsi judgement in which it ruled that Italy could place crucifixes on the walls of state [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/08/why-%e2%80%98splitting%e2%80%99-motherhood-is-against-the-rights-of-the-child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Reasons to Choose NaProTechnology Over InVitro Fertilization</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/10-reasons-to-choose-naprotechnology-over-invitro-fertilization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/10-reasons-to-choose-naprotechnology-over-invitro-fertilization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By David Picella For couples that are experiencing infertility, the desire to have a child can be overwhelming. Every month that passes is another missed opportunity. Depression, grief, sadness, and despair eventually set in and at some point most couples become desperate enough to gamble with tens of thousands of dollars on expensive procedures like [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/10-reasons-to-choose-naprotechnology-over-invitro-fertilization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are babies prizes or gifts?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/are-babies-prizes-or-gifts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/are-babies-prizes-or-gifts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 23:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Margaret Somerville A Canadian radio station created world-wide controversy recently when it ran a &#8220;win a baby&#8221; competition. An Ottawa music station, Hot 89.9, recently launched a “Win a Baby” contest. The prize offered was up to three rounds of fertility treatment worth C$35,000. It’s reported that the station received around 400 applications “from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/are-babies-prizes-or-gifts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Church’s Best kept secret: Church Teaching on Infertility Treatment</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/the-church%e2%80%99s-best-kept-secret-church-teaching-on-infertility-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/the-church%e2%80%99s-best-kept-secret-church-teaching-on-infertility-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 20:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tonight Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse will interview Katie Elrod. Elrod has been a humanities teacher and administrator in independent schools for over 15 years, and has taught in the Perspectives program at Boston College. She received her BA and MA in philosophy from Boston College, where she was a Lonergan Fellow. Elrod has spoken on natural [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/the-church%e2%80%99s-best-kept-secret-church-teaching-on-infertility-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science of eggsploitation</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/17/the-science-of-eggsploitation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/17/the-science-of-eggsploitation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Richard Egan Human cloning researchers pay women to risk death so they can pursue their doomed experiments. In an article published in Nature on 6 October 2011, Scott Noggle and his colleagues at the New York Stem Cell Foundation Laboratory report on their experiments in which they have derived stem cells from human embryos [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/17/the-science-of-eggsploitation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous No More: Child of Sperm Donor Speaks Out</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/15/anonymous-no-more-child-of-sperm-donor-speaks-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/15/anonymous-no-more-child-of-sperm-donor-speaks-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 21:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm donors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Such children struggle with a unique anxiety: What if I fall in love with my half-sibling? by CHRISTOPHER WHITE Thirty-two invitro fertilized children gather at the Swedish Medical Center in 2003 in Denver. The Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine at the Center gathered the children from each of its 16 years of work in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/15/anonymous-no-more-child-of-sperm-donor-speaks-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Babies for Sale: Buyer Beware</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/11/babies-for-sale-buyer-beware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/11/babies-for-sale-buyer-beware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surrogate Mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surrogate mothers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Infertility can bring so much heartache to couples desperately wanting a baby. Sadly, desperation opens the door for exploitation. Recently, two high-profile surrogacy attorneys, Theresa Erickson and Hilary Neiman, were caught exploiting surrogates, stealing from California taxpayers and, most horrifically, selling babies.  by Jennifer Lahl This article was first published at Tothesource.org on August 17, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/11/babies-for-sale-buyer-beware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One parent or five?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/07/one-parent-or-five/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/07/one-parent-or-five/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 03:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surrogate Mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surrogate mothers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Most couples who marry, even today, probably intend to have one or two children at least. Marriage and the baby carriage (as family scholar Brad Wilcox likes to pair them) have always gone together. But this is not what is meant by the new catch-phrase “intentional parenthood”. A report out today (golly, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/07/one-parent-or-five/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/20 queries in 0.285 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-11 07:31:59 -->
