Home > Babies, Children, Marriage, Parenting, Teenagers > And another reason not to delay having kids…

And another reason not to delay having kids…

July 7th, 2010

Having children:  you’ve got to do it.  If you don’t Charles Darwin will call you a loser or something.  And there’s that whole Demographic Winter thing too.  So, both for yourself and your society, you’ve got to have children.

But having children is hard.

I thought of something a friend once said about the Children’s Museum of Manhattan—“a nice place, but what it really needs is a bar”—and rued how, at that moment, the same thing could be said of my apartment. Two hundred and 40 seconds earlier, I’d been in a state of pair-bonded bliss; now I was guided by nerves, trawling the cabinets for alcohol. My emotional life looks a lot like this these days. I suspect it does for many parents—a high-amplitude, high-frequency sine curve along which we get the privilege of doing hourly surfs. Yet it’s something most of us choose. Indeed, it’s something most of us would say we’d be miserable without.

People today, however, delay having children.  Having children is hard enough.  Delaying the process only makes it harder.  “Oh,” you will say, “but if I have children later, I’ll have more money.  I’ll be able to buy them more stuff.  I’ll be able to hire more and better child care.  That’ll make it so much easier.”

Dream on.

As this article from New York magazine puts it:

Not only did they find that couples’ overall marital satisfaction went down if they had kids; they found that every successive generation was more put out by having them than the last—our current one most of all. Even more surprisingly, they found that parents’ dissatisfaction only grew the more money they had, even though they had the purchasing power to buy more child care. “And my hypothesis about why this is, in both cases, is the same,” says Twenge. “They become parents later in life. There’s a loss of freedom, a loss of autonomy. It’s totally different from going from your parents’ house to immediately having a baby. Now you know what you’re giving up.” (Or, as a fellow psychologist told Gilbert when he finally got around to having a child: “They’re a huge source of joy, but they turn every other source of joy to s@*t.”)

It wouldn’t be a particularly bold inference to say that the longer we put off having kids, the greater our expectations. “There’s all this buildup—as soon as I get this done, I’m going to have a baby, and it’s going to be a great reward!” says Ada Calhoun, the author of Instinctive Parenting and founding editor-in-chief of Babble, the online parenting site. “And then you’re like, ‘Wait, this is my reward? This nineteen-year grind?’ ”

When people wait to have children, they’re also bringing different sensibilities to the enterprise. They’ve spent their adult lives as professionals, believing there’s a right way and a wrong way of doing things; now they’re applying the same logic to the family-expansion business, and they’re surrounded by a marketplace that only affirms and reinforces this idea. “And what’s confusing about that,” says Alex Barzvi, a professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at NYU medical school, “is that there are a lot of things that parents can do to nurture social and cognitive development. There are right and wrong ways to discipline a child. But you can’t fall into the trap of comparing yourself to others and constantly concluding you’re doing the wrong thing.”

Yet that’s precisely what modern parents do. “It was especially bad in the beginning,” said a woman who recently attended a parents’ group led by Barzvi at the 92nd Street Y. “When I’d hear other moms saying, ‘Oh, so-and-so sleeps for twelve hours and naps for three,’ I’d think, Oh, s[ugar], I screwed up the sleep training.” Her parents—immigrants from huge families—couldn’t exactly relate to her distress. “They had no academic reference books for sleeping,” she says. (She’s read three.) “To my parents, it is what it is.”

So, don’t delay the inevitable.  Get married.  Have kids.  The sooner the better.

Spread the word:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • NewsVine
  1. politicaldoc
    July 9th, 2010 at 15:40 | #1

    I am a strong advocate of not delaying having your kids—physically, a woman’s body manages the stress of pregnancy alot better at 18 compared to age 38. No woman knows what her fertility will be after age 30.
    However, most women are not ready, dare I say mature enough, to get married at 18, and men are not prepared to take care of a family until perhaps 28.
    So, would you approve two 18 year olds marry and have kids—they would have to have financial support of their parents. Would it ever be wise to tell a very young couple to delay college if they could obtain decent wages perhaps through 2 year job training programs offered at community college?
    I do not believe every child is meant for a 4 year university.

  2. Arlemagne1
    July 9th, 2010 at 15:55 | #2

    Politicaldoc,
    Every situation is different. If you check out some of my older posts, I’m pretty convinced that college, for many if not most students, is for suckers. So, delaying marriage and children for that reason may be foolish. Delaying for reasons of establishing a livelihood is not. There are many ways to become ready for a livelihood without college (or G-d forbid, graduate school). (Full disclosure, I have a JD).

    I disagree that a woman of 18 (provided she has a source of livelihood) is not mature enough to have children. Not because women at that age are so mature, but because I’m not sure that much changes between 18 and 28 that makes it so much a better option to wait till then. Again, it’s a highly situation specific thing. Kids have a way of maturing people much better than just time on its own.

Comments are closed.