Wendy Shalit on Sex Ed
I wonder if the geniuses who thought up the idea of giving all children sex ed really thought through all of the possible consequences.
Witness the experience of one Wendy Shalit:
It is very strange to be on the receiving end of all this enlightenment, before the onset of sexual awakening. I remember when the sex educator arrived in my fourth-grade Wisconsin public elementary school classroom, carrying a Question Box, with black question marks all over it. It was our learning tool, she explained. Opening the lid, she pulled out a long white slip of paper and cheerily read: “And the first question is . . . ‘What is 69?’ “
Some boys in the corner giggled. “Now remember, boys and girls,” the woman continued, “there is absolutely nothing to giggle about! The first thing we’re going to learn in Human Growth and Development is that no question is off limits!” After what seemed like 69 attempts to explain the number 69, I raised my hand: “May I please go to the bathroom?” I hid there for awhile that day.
A week later, in time for our next sex ed class, I arrived at school toting a note from my mother. Thereafter, I sat out sex ed in the library. I always felt bad for the girls who didn’t have this escape, because after each sex ed session, as the lockers slammed and everyone prepared for the next class, the boys would pick on them, in a strange, new kind of teasing.
“Kelly, do you masturbate?” one boy would say. Then another boy would say, “It’s really natural to masturbate, you know.” Or: “Why aren’t you developing, Kelly? It’s time for you to be developing, didn’t you hear? You may be a treasure, Kelly, but you ain’t got no chest!”
And so on. Invariably, I noticed, just before the girl would burst into tears, she would always say the same thing: “The teacher says that if you tease us about what we learn in class, then you haven’t understood the principle of RESPECT.” Respect is a very important doctrine in sex education class. Indeed, sex ed teachers often use Respect, a puppet turtle, to teach elementary-school children about their “private places.” Unfortunately, the sex ed teacher would be gone by then, so no one really cared about what we had learned from Respect the turtle.
[...]
For some reason, no one connects this kind of harassment and early sex education. But to me the connection was obvious from the start, because the boys never teased me—they assumed I didn’t know what they were referring to. Whenever they would start to tease me, they always stopped when I gave them a confused look and said, “I have no idea what you guys are talking about. I was in the library.” They would almost be apologetic: “Oh, right—you’re the weirdo who always goes to the library.” And they would pass me by.
It seems logical that children should learn about human physiology in general and the physiology of reproduction in particular. But why do we need to teach children how to achieve sexual pleasure? Won’t they learn that on their own?

…….So, to lesson to take away from this is that boys will bully girls about sex, thus sex shouldn’t be taught in school.
Here I read that and thought, maybe we should encourage better parenting of boys. Or you know, work to decrease bullying.
Any adult tries to teach my 4th grader about “69″ had better have a good dental plan.
Nerdygirl,
Other than the bare physiology of it, sex is something that kids will learn about on their own. They should not waste class time teaching that when they could be learning non-obvious things.
The bullying about that and stuff is just another bad side effect of a bad idea.
As far as raising better boys goes, I’m all for it. Let’s not have the government interfere so as to hinder that either.
Haha….aaah. I don’t think this blog was originally intended to make me laugh so much, but it is quite the pleasant side effect.
Bullying is a side-effect of society. Those boys wouldn’t have been perfect little angels if only they never learned what masturbation was, they’d have been picking on girls for some other reason.
Schools have a responsibility to lessen the effects of bullying, after all, thats where most of it occurs. Parents have a responsibility to raise their children to be decent humans.
As far as learning sex on their own, well yes. But it’s probably better to learn a boring clinical version then a dolled up, romanticized version from the media and friends.
Nerdygirl said:
“Bullying is a side-effect of society.”
Don’t come at me with that. Please. What does it even mean?
Well, lets see, some kids bully because their brats. Some bully for attention. Some bully because difference and change scare them. Some bully because they were never taught hurting others is wrong.
But no kid bully’s just because they learned what a sex term is. That kid was bullying others long before that. So, dismissing sex education because another child might tease another is well-intentioned but short-sighted and naive at best.
Nerdygirl,
I proposed dismissing sex ed because it’s useless and wasteful of class time, not because of bullying. You’re not reading what I’m writing.
As far as the causes of bullying are concerned, they are irrelevant. The issue Ms. Shalit brought up is the CONTENT of the bullying. Had they not learned what they learned in their sex ed class, they probably would have been less sexually aggressive. Perhaps they would have been aggressive in other ways, but that’s not certain.
LOL! No way am I buying this part. Nice try, Wendy.
“You’re not reading what I’m writing.”
I misread into the context of a post about dismissing sex ed because girls were bullied. You may be for getting rid of sex ed because you feel lt wastes class time, but in context with the post one would assume bullying is a part of it.
” Perhaps they would have been aggressive in other ways, but that’s not certain.”
You obviously were never bullied as a child.
Nerdygirl: You wrote: “You obviously were never bullied as a child.”
You’re not a very good guesser. Leave that kind of thing to me. I’m better at it.
Then you didn’t learn much from your experience. Surprising really.
The real lesson was about political correctness.
Regarding the bullying part of the story, well, the mystery of sex makes for profound vulnerabilities. The boys reacted one way; the girls another. They learned these lessons just one step outside the classroom in which the sex ed teacher posed as an authority on dispelling the myster of sex.
All in the best interests of children. Sure.
Nerdygirl,
What exactly was I supposed to have learned?
What I actually did learn was how not to get picked on by improving some social skills and getting strong enough to defend myself with my hands. Worked like a charm.