<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s at stake in redefining marriage: More power for the state</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/13/whats-at-stake-in-redefining-marriage-more-power-for-the-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/13/whats-at-stake-in-redefining-marriage-more-power-for-the-state/</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:17:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin J Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/13/whats-at-stake-in-redefining-marriage-more-power-for-the-state/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin J Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1056#comment-753</guid>
		<description>&quot;Contrary to some libertarians who woudl like to think that ssm represents a retreat of the state from civil society, the exact opposite is true. The state will assign itself the power to intervene in more and more areas of civil society, until it is satisfied that they have made everything equal.&quot;

I keep pointing this out, but some libertarians are immune. Their incomprehension of social forms of liberty makes them support SSM and also makes them blind to the consequences for the freedom of groups that won&#039;t go along with the proposed changes to society. This is a case where personal liberty is the enemy of political liberty.

Libertarians back some so-called progressive goals under the illusion that they, and not the progressives, will be running the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Contrary to some libertarians who woudl like to think that ssm represents a retreat of the state from civil society, the exact opposite is true. The state will assign itself the power to intervene in more and more areas of civil society, until it is satisfied that they have made everything equal.&#8221;</p>
<p>I keep pointing this out, but some libertarians are immune. Their incomprehension of social forms of liberty makes them support SSM and also makes them blind to the consequences for the freedom of groups that won&#8217;t go along with the proposed changes to society. This is a case where personal liberty is the enemy of political liberty.</p>
<p>Libertarians back some so-called progressive goals under the illusion that they, and not the progressives, will be running the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/9 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-11 16:04:09 -->
