<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; population control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/tag/population-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What!? Look at plans for compulsory sterilization, abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/what-look-at-plans-for-compulsory-sterilization-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/what-look-at-plans-for-compulsory-sterilization-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Planned Parenthood director Abby Johnson says &#8216;we were not allowed to talk about it&#8217; WND A stunning Planned Parenthood document that includes radical ideas such as compulsory abortion and sterilization; special &#8220;permits&#8221; to have children; penalizing parents; and encouraging homosexuality dovetails with some Obamacare mandates, according to a former Planned Parenthood director. Abby Johnson, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/what-look-at-plans-for-compulsory-sterilization-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Billionaires for Eugenics</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/10/billionaires-for-eugenics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/10/billionaires-for-eugenics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 16:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The website is slightly unhinged, but I love this headline. Billionaires for Eugenics.  The solution to the problems of poor people is to have fewer poor people. The way to have fewer poor people is not to uplift the poor people, but to get rid of the poor people. Indirectly of course, by having them have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/10/billionaires-for-eugenics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our brave new world of Malthusian madmen</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/11/30/our-brave-new-world-of-malthusian-madmen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/11/30/our-brave-new-world-of-malthusian-madmen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Over-Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=4627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Brendan O’Neill Much of the wacky authoritarianism of twentieth-century dystopian literature is now coming to life, from the promotion of homosexuality as a check on population growth to the celebration of childfree women as superior to ‘breeders’. Reading an op-ed in an American newspaper last month, which argued that gay marriage should be legalised [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/11/30/our-brave-new-world-of-malthusian-madmen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contra Contraception: Diversionary Tactics</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/29/contra-contraception-diversionary-tactics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/29/contra-contraception-diversionary-tactics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 23:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fifty Years on the Pill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First up in our series of contrarian articles on contraception: We need Penicillin, not condoms, in Central Africa. The diversion of health care dollars and medical personel from urgent matters like sanitation and into &#8220;family planning,&#8221; is something that deeply offends many African recipients of foreign aid. This article was written by an attorney in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/29/contra-contraception-diversionary-tactics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Depo-Provera delivery in Ecuador questioned</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/23/depo-provera-delivery-in-ecuador-questioned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/23/depo-provera-delivery-in-ecuador-questioned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is gross. Have I given the impression that I&#8217;m not fond of Planned Parenthood yet? The latest news was that they were sending birth control and condoms to Haiti! &#8220;Sorry you lost 200,000 of your people. Here&#8217;s a way to be sure you don&#8217;t have any more!&#8221; And now using fishy means to try [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/23/depo-provera-delivery-in-ecuador-questioned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bangladesh endorses one-child policy</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/08/bangladesh-endorses-one-child-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/08/bangladesh-endorses-one-child-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one-child policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, terrific. Another China. As though things are just peachy over there. Right now the policy is voluntary, but I wonder how long that will last? Michael Cook, Mercatornet.com Bangladesh is going to introduce a voluntary &#8220;one couple, one child&#8221; population planning policy by 2015 to curb its growing population. The Director General of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/08/bangladesh-endorses-one-child-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Dickens are population controllers up to?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/08/990/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/08/990/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. I love the way this guy thinks. Michael Cook, Mercatornet.com &#8230;Take the Optimum Population Trust, a superannuated gaggle of gimlet-eyed, thin-lipped Gradgrinds who out-Scrooge Scrooge. Their aim is to slash the number of unfeathered bipeds who pollute the earth with carbon emissions. &#8220;Everything we manage to achieve for the natural environment is being wiped [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/01/08/990/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/17 queries in 0.010 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-11 00:13:29 -->
