<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/tag/obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Regarding the Department of Health &amp; Human Services (HHS) Mandate:</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/regarding-the-department-of-health-human-services-hhs-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/regarding-the-department-of-health-human-services-hhs-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious liberty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never before in our U.S. history has the Federal Government forced citizens to directly purchase what violates our religious beliefs. The issue here . . . is the survival of a cornerstone constitutionally protected freedom that ensures respect for conscience and religious liberty. -Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Galveston-Houston This latest erosion of our first freedom [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/regarding-the-department-of-health-human-services-hhs-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military Tells Catholic Chaplains What They Can and Can&#8217;t Say About Obama Administration&#8217;s Assault on Religion</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/military-tells-catholic-chaplains-what-they-can-and-cant-say-about-obama-administrations-assault-on-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/military-tells-catholic-chaplains-what-they-can-and-cant-say-about-obama-administrations-assault-on-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Jim Hoft Last week Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan lashed out at the Obama Administration for forcing religious organizations to go out into the marketplace and buy a product that violates their conscience. The rule would force Christian organizations to provide free contraceptives, sterilizations and abortion drugs to workers even though this violates Catholic Church teaching. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/military-tells-catholic-chaplains-what-they-can-and-cant-say-about-obama-administrations-assault-on-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We’re All Catholics Now</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/we%e2%80%99re-all-catholics-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/we%e2%80%99re-all-catholics-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By David French I’m not the first to comment on the Obama administration’s breathtaking assault on religious liberty, I won’t be the last, and I’m certainly not the most eloquent. I am, however, a lawyer prepared to do something about it. At issue are two competing visions of religion in American public life. For the Obama [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/we%e2%80%99re-all-catholics-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tightening the screws</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/tightening-the-screws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/tightening-the-screws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by James S. Cole The Obama Adminstration is attacking religious rights by mandating that all health-care plans, even church-run one, must provide cover for abortion and contraception. On January 11, the United States Supreme Court reproved the Obama Administration by issuing a 9-0 decision against the Government in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/tightening-the-screws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Message from Chuck Colson</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/message-from-chuck-colson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/message-from-chuck-colson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious liberty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Co-laborers, We must all act together NOW. What is going on today is the greatest test of religious liberty we will have faced in our life time. If the administration does not back down, religious liberty—as clearly articulated in the Constitution and in court cases—will be gravely impaired.  And your organization, like mine, will face [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/message-from-chuck-colson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The end of the world as we know it</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Dr. Jennifer Roback  Morse No, I’m not exaggerating. The American Experiment in religious liberty is officially over. The First Amendment provided institutional structures that allow different religions to peacefully coexist. All groups agree to NOT try to capture governmental structures for the benefit of their own particular denomination.  But the Obama Administration has ended [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Catholic Strategy in Shambles</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/obamas-catholic-strategy-in-shambles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/obamas-catholic-strategy-in-shambles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/11/15/obamas_catholic_strategy_in_shambles_112067.html Obama&#8217;s Catholic outreach is being revealed as a transparent ploy a year before he faces re-election. A portion of the Democratic coalition &#8212; including civil libertarians and pro-choice activists &#8212; has decided to attack and marginalize Catholic leaders and institutions. And HHS is actively siding against Catholic organizations. &#8220;We are in a war,&#8221; Sebelius [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/obamas-catholic-strategy-in-shambles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Moves to Interfere in New Hampshire</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/09/09/obama-moves-to-interfere-in-new-hampshire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/09/09/obama-moves-to-interfere-in-new-hampshire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is very interesting: the Obama administration is thwarting the will of the people.  The big old federal thumb is securely on the scale here, tipping people’s “choices.” This week President Obama addressed Congress and the American people to lay out his latest plan for job creation. But actions speak louder than words. And President [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/09/09/obama-moves-to-interfere-in-new-hampshire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DoMA Drama</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/09/doma-drama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/09/doma-drama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 20:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Norrie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King & Spalding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Clement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(May 4, 2011) Dr J and Todd Wilken meet on Issues, Etc to discuss the federal Defense of Marriage Act, the federal government&#8217;s refusal to defend it when challenged in court, and the private legal defense that is stepping into the breach. Listen here.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/09/doma-drama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/ruthinstitute/May09_11.mp3" length="0" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So Now It&#8217;s Going To Be Collusive Litigation By Obama, Is It?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/03/so-now-its-going-to-be-collusive-litigation-by-obama-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/03/so-now-its-going-to-be-collusive-litigation-by-obama-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 03:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Legalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the FRC article: As the president of the Family Research Council (FRC), an organization that has filed amicus briefs defending both Proposition 8 and DoMA, I am troubled by the lightning-fast integration of concepts and actual language from the Attorney General Letter into the Motion to Vacate Stay. Let me repeat: the Motion was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/03/so-now-its-going-to-be-collusive-litigation-by-obama-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are monogamy-only laws unconstitutional?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/02/28/are-monogamy-only-laws-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/02/28/are-monogamy-only-laws-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 23:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Legalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philosopher Francis Beckwith has posted a short, but incisive, comment on patheos.com concerning the legal implications of the &#8216;reasoning&#8217; undergirding the Obama administration&#8217;s refusal to continue to defend DOMA. This is the core of his argument: &#8230;there are sexual minorities, the polyamorous, whose sexual orientation requires more than one partner. But if sexual orientation requires [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/02/28/are-monogamy-only-laws-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCCB Decries Refusal to Support Defense of Marriage Act</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/02/26/usccb-decries-refusal-to-support-defense-of-marriage-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/02/26/usccb-decries-refusal-to-support-defense-of-marriage-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON—The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops issued the following from its Office of General Counsel: “Marriage has been understood for millennia and across cultures as the union of one man and one woman. Today, the President has instructed the Department of Justice to stop defending the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law reiterating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/02/26/usccb-decries-refusal-to-support-defense-of-marriage-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time for a Real Defense of DOMA</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/02/23/time-for-a-real-defense-of-doma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/02/23/time-for-a-real-defense-of-doma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is aptly titled. Obama never intended to defend marriage and has done nothing but undermine DOMA in court. That was his only objective all along. All of his prior professions that he valued the institution of marriage were nothing more than deliberate acts of deceit devised to win elections. As another article (Obama [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/02/23/time-for-a-real-defense-of-doma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fathers&#8217; Day and Homosexual Parenting</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/22/fathers-day-and-homosexual-parenting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/22/fathers-day-and-homosexual-parenting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Norrie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New podcast!  Drew Mariani interviews Dr J on his radio show about Fathers&#8217; Day, the president&#8217;s speech commemorating same, homosexual parenting, and the oft-mentioned Pediatrics study championing lesbian parenting.  Listen here. Fathers&#8217; Day and Homosexual Parenting]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/22/fathers-day-and-homosexual-parenting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.libsyn.com/media/ruthinstitute/Jun22_10.mp3" length="13004717" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A pledge to fight &#8216;mega-genocide&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/20/a-pledge-to-fight-mega-genocide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/20/a-pledge-to-fight-mega-genocide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carolyn Moynihan, Mercatornet.com While defenders of unborn life waged a successful battle in the United States House last weekend, winning a provision to exclude abortion coverage from health reform legislation, an international gathering in Spain was defining abortion as “mega-genocide” and pledging to fight harder to protect human life. The Declaration of Saragossa, signed by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/20/a-pledge-to-fight-mega-genocide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have death panels already arrived?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/20/have-death-panels-already-arrived/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/20/have-death-panels-already-arrived/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assisted Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assisted suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nurses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nancy Valko, Mercatornet.com The case against: an experienced nurse worries that Obamacare will entrench an existing quality-of-life ethic.  Medical ethics are concerned with care for a patient’s welfare, something huge institutions are not very good at. The controversy about &#8220;death panels&#8221; in proposed health care reform legislation is to be expected. As a nurse, despite [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/20/have-death-panels-already-arrived/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Blue Dogs stand fast against abortion coverage?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/06/will-blue-dogs-stand-fast-against-abortion-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/06/will-blue-dogs-stand-fast-against-abortion-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prolife movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Brown &#8211; OneNewsNow Just two days before a possible vote on their healthcare bill, Democratic leaders in the House have still refused to include a provision in the legislation that would prohibit taxpayer funding of abortion under a new public health insurance program. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) is hoping to begin floor debate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/06/will-blue-dogs-stand-fast-against-abortion-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Healthcare Problem Washington May Have Missed</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/06/a-healthcare-problem-washington-may-have-missed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/06/a-healthcare-problem-washington-may-have-missed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bishop James D. Conley]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/06/a-healthcare-problem-washington-may-have-missed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Believe it&#8230;abortion funding is in healthcare bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/03/believe-it-abortion-funding-is-in-healthcare-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/03/believe-it-abortion-funding-is-in-healthcare-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Brown &#8211; OneNewsNow A national pro-life group is warning members of Congress that a vote in favor of the 1,990-page House healthcare bill is a vote to establish a federal government program that would directly fund abortion-on-demand with taxpayer dollars. Page 110 of H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act, authorizes a new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/11/03/believe-it-abortion-funding-is-in-healthcare-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gov&#8217;t springs for older LGBT population</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/10/31/govt-springs-for-older-lgbt-population/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/10/31/govt-springs-for-older-lgbt-population/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bisexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transgender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Brown &#8211; OneNewsNow The Obama administration plans to set up &#8220;the nation&#8217;s first national resource center&#8221; for older homosexual, bisexual, and transgender Americans. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Wednesday announced in a press release that the new Resource Center for LGBT Elders &#8220;will provide information, assistance, and resources for both LGBT [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2009/10/31/govt-springs-for-older-lgbt-population/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 14/21 queries in 1.579 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-09 08:54:24 -->
