<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/tag/abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Study Pinpoints Oral Contraceptive-Breast Cancer Link (OCBC link); Resurrects Abortion-Breast Cancer Link (ABC link)</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/new-study-pinpoints-oral-contraceptive-breast-cancer-link-ocbc-link-resurrects-abortion-breast-cancer-link-abc-link/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/new-study-pinpoints-oral-contraceptive-breast-cancer-link-ocbc-link-resurrects-abortion-breast-cancer-link-abc-link/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Joel Brind, Ph.D. &#8230; &#8220;Brinton was the chief organizer for the 2003 NCI (U.S. National Cancer Institute) “workshop” on “early reproductive events and breast cancer”, a panel which reported that the lack of an ABC link had been “established”. In other words, since 2003, the NCI has firmly maintained the position that there is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/new-study-pinpoints-oral-contraceptive-breast-cancer-link-ocbc-link-resurrects-abortion-breast-cancer-link-abc-link/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood&#8217;s Hostages</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/planned-parenthoods-hostages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/planned-parenthoods-hostages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan G. Komen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The abortion provider uses a vast media and political network to maintain its subsidies from government and private charities. By ROBERT P. GEORGE AND O. CARTER SNEAD The Susan G. Komen Foundation, an organization dedicated since 1982 to fighting, and one day curing, breast cancer, decided to extricate itself from the culture wars by discontinuing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/planned-parenthoods-hostages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did we learn from the Komen-PP fiasco?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/what-did-we-learn-from-the-komen-pp-fiasco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/what-did-we-learn-from-the-komen-pp-fiasco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan G. Komen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Sheila Liaugminas It has been deeply revealing and we have learned much. First of all, that the relationship existed. After all the years of doubt or uncertainty by many contributors to the Pink Ribbon campaign over whether the Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure donated some of those funds to Planned Parenthood, it’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/what-did-we-learn-from-the-komen-pp-fiasco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Komen Get It</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/komen-get-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/komen-get-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By JAMES TARANTO Planned Parenthood&#8217;s bitter campaign against Komen&#8211;aided by left-liberal activists and media&#8211;is analogous to a protection racket: Nice charity you&#8217;ve got there. It&#8217;d be a shame if anything happened to it. The message to other Planned Parenthood donors is that if they don&#8217;t play nice and keep coughing up the cash, they&#8217;ll get [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/komen-get-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>West Coast Walk for Life&#8211;a student&#8217;s perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/west-coast-walk-for-life-a-students-perspective/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/west-coast-walk-for-life-a-students-perspective/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk for life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My name is Margaret Kelledy. I am a senior at Azusa Pacific University, and the President of our Students for Life chapter. I have been an avid pro-life activist for nearly nine years but I was never able to attend a Walk for Life until this year. As I walked through the streets of San [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/08/west-coast-walk-for-life-a-students-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Komen official quits over Planned Parenthood dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/komen-official-quits-over-planned-parenthood-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/komen-official-quits-over-planned-parenthood-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charlie Butts Komen initially decided to stop providing funds to Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion-provider in the country. It had reportedly adopted new criteria excluding the clinic chain from future grants for breast cancer screenings because it was under government investigation at the urging of pro-life groups. But after being bombarded by abortion proponents, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/komen-official-quits-over-planned-parenthood-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Komen disgraces its own cause</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/komen-disgraces-its-own-cause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/komen-disgraces-its-own-cause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan B. Komen Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Peter Heck Call it Planned Parenthood&#8217;s war on choice. In less time than it takes to scald a child to death with a saline injection into the womb, the rabid pro-abortion lobby descended like vultures down upon the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation. The Komen crime? They dared exercise their right to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/komen-disgraces-its-own-cause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-abortion groups cite alleged cancer-abortion link to explain Komen&#8217;s split with Planned Parenthood</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/04/anti-abortion-groups-cite-alleged-cancer-abortion-link-to-explain-komens-split-with-planned-parenthood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/04/anti-abortion-groups-cite-alleged-cancer-abortion-link-to-explain-komens-split-with-planned-parenthood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Judson Berger As the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation faces accusations that it split with Planned Parenthood over political pressure, at least a couple pro-life groups are claiming the organization may have acted out of concern over an alleged link between abortion and breast cancer. The theory that induced abortion increases the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/04/anti-abortion-groups-cite-alleged-cancer-abortion-link-to-explain-komens-split-with-planned-parenthood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breast Cancer and birth control/abortion links</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/04/breast-cancer-and-birth-controlabortion-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/04/breast-cancer-and-birth-controlabortion-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Breast Cancer: Risks and Prevention&#8221;, by Angela Lanfranchi, MD, FACS and Joel Brind, PhD: &#8216;This booklet is written to help women understand what their risk factors are for the development of breast cancer and how they can reduce their risks.&#8221; A few excerpts from the preface of the last 2 editions: Over the last thirty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/04/breast-cancer-and-birth-controlabortion-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catholics United’s defense of contraception mandate draws criticism</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/04/catholics-united%e2%80%99s-defense-of-contraception-mandate-draws-criticism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/04/catholics-united%e2%80%99s-defense-of-contraception-mandate-draws-criticism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Roback Morse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Kevin J. Jones Washington D.C., Jan 25, 2012 / 05:52 pm (CNA).- A Democratic-leaning Catholic group’s favorable reaction to the Obama administration’s new contraception mandate is being criticized for neglecting the threat to religious freedom and wrongly claiming that contraception lowers the abortion rate. “This is a real attack on the religious freedom of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/04/catholics-united%e2%80%99s-defense-of-contraception-mandate-draws-criticism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times ignores March for Life for fifth year in a row: WaPo focuses on pro-aborts</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/30/new-york-times-ignores-march-for-life-for-fifth-year-in-a-row-wapo-focuses-on-pro-aborts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/30/new-york-times-ignores-march-for-life-for-fifth-year-in-a-row-wapo-focuses-on-pro-aborts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by John Jalsevac Click to watch video. January 24, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – What’s more newsworthy: that several hundred thousand people converged on Capitol Hill in the midst of a cold rain in the middle of January in order to protest abortion, or that a tiny handful of pro-abortion counter protesters showed up as well? Here’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/30/new-york-times-ignores-march-for-life-for-fifth-year-in-a-row-wapo-focuses-on-pro-aborts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;INVISIBLE&#8221; March for Life</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/27/the-invisible-march-for-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/27/the-invisible-march-for-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prolife movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question for the media: Are pro-lifers invisible? When 300,000 people show up for the March for Life in Washington, D.C., the media mentions next to nothing. When the multitude is especially youthful and upbeat, the liberal media says they&#8217;re mostly old and tired. Watch this live footage and see the truth for yourself: 2012 March [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/27/the-invisible-march-for-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion research initiative aims at better understanding and information</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/25/abortion-research-initiative-aims-at-better-understanding-and-information/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/25/abortion-research-initiative-aims-at-better-understanding-and-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion risks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan If you have ever wanted to get a fully professional, reliable angle on abortion research a new initiative by Priscilla Kari Coleman (interviewed by MercatorNetin November) should interest you. Professor Coleman, Professor of Human Development and Family Studies at Bowling Green University in Ohio and a leading abortion researcher, has just launched [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/25/abortion-research-initiative-aims-at-better-understanding-and-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-lifers: Extension proves WH &#8216;addicted&#8217; to abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/25/pro-lifers-extension-proves-wh-addicted-to-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/25/pro-lifers-extension-proves-wh-addicted-to-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charlie Butts According to Paul Rondeau, executive director of the American Life League, &#8220;This administration treats Catholics as useful idiots&#8221; and generally undermines religious freedom. &#8220;We all know that this administration has a contraceptive mindset. They are abortion-addicted, and this is simply one more &#8216;kick the can down the road until after the election,&#8217; where [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/25/pro-lifers-extension-proves-wh-addicted-to-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.onenewsnow.com/uploadedFiles/Media/Audio/2012/01/25/CHARLIEBECKETVOICER.mp3" length="1801195" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The youth and the fight against abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/24/the-youth-and-the-fight-against-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/24/the-youth-and-the-fight-against-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march for life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Katie Hinderer Monday, January 23, marks the 39th anniversary of Roe vs Wade. Hundreds of thousands of young people journeyed to our nation’s capital to protest this Supreme Court decision. This is nothing new; the protest and march has been going on for years, and it has been gaining in popularity. In fact it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/24/the-youth-and-the-fight-against-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Unbearable Wrongness of Roe</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/the-unbearable-wrongness-of-roe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/the-unbearable-wrongness-of-roe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Michael Stokes Paulsen January 23, 2012 http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2012/01/4577 39 years ago, the Supreme Court delivered a radical, legally untenable, immoral decision. It has forfeited its entitlement to have its decisions respected, and followed, by the other branches of government, by the states, and by the people. Today, thousands of people at the March for Life [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/the-unbearable-wrongness-of-roe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where states stand on life</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/where-states-stand-on-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/where-states-stand-on-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charlie Butts Americans United for Life (AUL) has released its seventh annual &#8220;Life List&#8221; revealing how states are moving closer to a pro-life America. Forty-seven states considered more than 460 abortion-related measures and enacted more than 70 of them. At least 86 bills were introduced in 32 states that were based on the pro-life group&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/where-states-stand-on-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>March to recognize lost generation</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/march-to-recognize-lost-generation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/march-to-recognize-lost-generation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[march for life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charlie Butts Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion in the United States. The Annual March for Life is under way in the nation&#8217;s capital with as many as 200,000 pro-lifers braving poor weather conditions in Washington to march to the steps of the Supreme Court, where abortion was legalized on January 22, 1973. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/march-to-recognize-lost-generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Can’t Order Mentally Disabled Woman to Have Abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/19/judge-can%e2%80%99t-order-mentally-disabled-woman-to-have-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/19/judge-can%e2%80%99t-order-mentally-disabled-woman-to-have-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eugenics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Rob Schwarzwalder A judge’s decision to order the abortion of “a mentally ill woman’s unborn baby and sterilize her — if it meant she had to be ‘coaxed, bribed, or even enticed … by ruse’ into the procedure” has drawn appropriate fire from officials in the Bay State. Judge Christina Harms, who retired from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/19/judge-can%e2%80%99t-order-mentally-disabled-woman-to-have-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support Marriage While Walking for Life West Coast Jan 21</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/support-marriage-while-walking-for-life-west-coast-jan-21/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/support-marriage-while-walking-for-life-west-coast-jan-21/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet at the Stand with Children Info Booth 8th Annual Walk for Life West Coast on Saturday Join us to promote marriage and family while walking for life at the 8th Annual Walk for Life West Coast in San Francisco this Saturday, January 21, 2012. Meet leaders from around the state as we gather at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/support-marriage-while-walking-for-life-west-coast-jan-21/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/15 queries in 0.061 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-10 20:07:47 -->
