<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; Sexual Integrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/category/sexual-integrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Movie morality is plummeting</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/movie-morality-is-plummeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/movie-morality-is-plummeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[popular culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualization of teens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by William West Film censors are allowing teens to access much more explicit content and few parents seem to care A time traveller from the 20th Century would very likely be shocked by how standards have plummeted in the film industry in a little over a decade – particularly with movies aimed at the teen [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/movie-morality-is-plummeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changing the world: one college campus at a time</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/21/changing-the-world-one-college-campus-at-a-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/21/changing-the-world-one-college-campus-at-a-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hook-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hooking up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Joanna Hyatt This past summer, I spent a fantastic weekend as one of about 40 international students who attended the Ruth Institute&#8217;s &#8220;It Takes a Family&#8221; 2011 conference (ITAF). While there, I met two students from the University of Pittsburgh, Joseph Petrich and Alex Souchuns. Both are involved in the Anscombe Society on campus, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/21/changing-the-world-one-college-campus-at-a-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Child Sexual Abuse and the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/child-sexual-abuse-and-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/child-sexual-abuse-and-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carson Holloway November 17, 2011 http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2011/11/4311 The Supreme Court has helped to foster a culture that encourages the sexual exploitation of children. The child sexual abuse scandal now engulfing Penn State has given rise to much commentary on how people&#8217;s values can be distorted by the desire to protect a successful and venerated football [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/child-sexual-abuse-and-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>College Girls Looking for “Sugar Daddies” Abound</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/college-girls-looking-for-%e2%80%9csugar-daddies%e2%80%9d-abound/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/college-girls-looking-for-%e2%80%9csugar-daddies%e2%80%9d-abound/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hook-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This used to be called prostitution&#8211;now it&#8217;s just debt reduction: &#8230;There is a plethora of on-line dating sites, calling themselves arrangement sites, where young women looking to pay down college debt are matched to older, wealthy donors. What is not advertised, but is clearly understood by reading young women’s confessionals in a recent Huffington Post [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/17/college-girls-looking-for-%e2%80%9csugar-daddies%e2%80%9d-abound/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Glee&#8217; sends wrong message on teen sex</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/12/glee-sends-wrong-message-on-teen-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/12/glee-sends-wrong-message-on-teen-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[popular culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Melissa Henson, Special to CNN Editor&#8217;s note: Melissa Henson is the director of communications and public education for the Parents Television Council, a nonpartisan education organization advocating responsible entertainment. (CNN) &#8212; Kids having sex on prime time broadcast TV? Must be sweeps month. It&#8217;s so predictable, it&#8217;s almost laughable. Almost. That is, it would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/12/glee-sends-wrong-message-on-teen-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No &#8216;Glee&#8217; About Virginity</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/12/no-glee-about-virginity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/12/no-glee-about-virginity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 22:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Brent Bozell In Hollywood, the only truly serious sexual disease is virginity. It&#8217;s a dire and embarrassing condition, desperately in need of elimination. Teenagers that still have &#8220;it&#8221; are woefully immature. They might as well consider themselves to be walking the school hallways in diapers. Along comes Fox Entertainment to enlighten us. Get ready. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/12/no-glee-about-virginity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Why Young Persons Would Wait Forevermore”</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/10/%e2%80%9cwhy-young-persons-would-wait-forevermore%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/10/%e2%80%9cwhy-young-persons-would-wait-forevermore%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manliness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hook-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian custody cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Catherine Palmer Posted on November 8th, 2011 by Love and Fidelity Network John Blake’s recent CCN article, “Why Young Christians Aren’t Waiting Anymore,” sparked a flurry of thousands of responses. Released in September 2011, the piece cited an article in Relevant magazine entitled “(Almost) Everyone’s Doing It,” exploring the sexual activity of Christian singles. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/10/%e2%80%9cwhy-young-persons-would-wait-forevermore%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saved Sex:  Loving Our Young People Enough to Tell Them the Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/10/saved-sex-loving-our-young-people-enough-to-tell-them-the-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/10/saved-sex-loving-our-young-people-enough-to-tell-them-the-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hook-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Terrell Clemmons Okay, I need to understand this &#8216;victory,&#8217;&#8221; Jeannie started in. The governor of our state had just signed legislation stripping abortion giant Planned Parenthood of about $4 million in annual taxpayer funding. &#8220;First, you do not want to teach sex-ed and provide condoms in schools. Second, you do not want to fund [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/10/saved-sex-loving-our-young-people-enough-to-tell-them-the-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More US teenagers are delaying sex</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/04/more-us-teenagers-are-delaying-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/04/more-us-teenagers-are-delaying-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 19:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More good news. Praise God we are heading in the right direction. by Carolyn Moynihan On the Family Scholars blog, David Lapp draws attention to official figures showing that the proportion of teenagers having sex has dropped over the past two decades or so. He writes: People who make the case for chastity are frequently greeted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/04/more-us-teenagers-are-delaying-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A rap over the knuckles for offensive lyrics</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/04/a-rap-over-the-knuckles-for-offensive-lyrics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/04/a-rap-over-the-knuckles-for-offensive-lyrics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Way to go Britain! Why don&#8217;t we do more of this here? by Carolyn Moynihan The latest move in Britain’s clampdown on the sexualization of children is a warning to broadcasters to keep offensive lyrics off the radio waves at times when children are likely to be listening. The times highlighted by Ofcom, the media [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/04/a-rap-over-the-knuckles-for-offensive-lyrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“I’m sorry I did not wait”</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/%e2%80%9ci%e2%80%99m-sorry-i-did-not-wait%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/%e2%80%9ci%e2%80%99m-sorry-i-did-not-wait%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Pressure and lack of self control lead teens in developing countries to regret sex, a new study shows. Next week a British television channel begins the second series of a show called “The Joy of Teen Sex”. The programme promises “A bold, informative look at the love lives and sex lives of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/%e2%80%9ci%e2%80%99m-sorry-i-did-not-wait%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK tightens rules to protect children from sexual images</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/11/uk-tightens-rules-to-protect-children-from-sexual-images/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/11/uk-tightens-rules-to-protect-children-from-sexual-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is good news. by Carolyn Moynihan Britain’s advertising watchdog has taken on board concerns about the exposure of children to sexual imagery and will be taking a firmer line on outdoor ads in response to complaints. The Advertising Standards Authority has issued a statement to the advertising industry, saying that “protection of children from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/11/uk-tightens-rules-to-protect-children-from-sexual-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Friends with benefits”: but who benefits?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/17/%e2%80%9cfriends-with-benefits%e2%80%9d-but-who-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/17/%e2%80%9cfriends-with-benefits%e2%80%9d-but-who-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends with benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Mariette Ulrich When I saw ads for the recently released Friends with Benefits, I thought I was experiencing déjà vu. Wasn’t that film released last year? Why no, the movie I had in mind was different, and it was titled No Strings Attached. Well, not entirely different; same frivolous treatment of self-centred loveless sex; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/17/%e2%80%9cfriends-with-benefits%e2%80%9d-but-who-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please stop sexualizing our children</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/16/please-stop-sexualizing-our-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/16/please-stop-sexualizing-our-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Dr. Michael L. Brown The recent cover of the French edition of Vogue magazine caused considerable controversy, and it was not because of the all too typical, female model featured in a sensual pose. Instead, it was the fact that the model this time was a 10-year-old girl. The headline of an article appearing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/16/please-stop-sexualizing-our-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Body language</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/08/body-language/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/08/body-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 19:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual revolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Anthony Esolen The body has a language of its own, and the sexual revolution is founded upon a lie. Recently in Public Discourse, I challenged readers to defend the sexual revolution on the grounds that it has conduced to the common good. No one took up that challenge. It would be, I suppose, rather [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/08/body-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuart Schneiderman on GGG</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/07/stuart-schneiderman-on-ggg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/07/stuart-schneiderman-on-ggg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Happy Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Radicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual revolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;This is what happens when you take bad advice.&#8221;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/07/stuart-schneiderman-on-ggg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shocker: Co-Ed Dorms May Be Bad for Your Behavior</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/06/shocker-single-sex-dorms-may-be-bad-for-your-behavior/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/06/shocker-single-sex-dorms-may-be-bad-for-your-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 23:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Maggie Gallagher, Chairman of the National Organization for Marriage John Garvey, the new President of Catholic University, announced last week that the university will return to single sex dorms. Many feathers were ruffled. It is a measure of the unisex madness in which we have become enmeshed that a Catholic university’s decision to house [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/06/shocker-single-sex-dorms-may-be-bad-for-your-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zimbabwe, HIV and Behavioural Change</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/04/zimbabwe-hiv-and-behavioural-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/04/zimbabwe-hiv-and-behavioural-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Condomism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hook-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[condoms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Marcus Roberts Last week I mentioned that the number of centenarians is predicted to increase to over one million in five different countries by 2100.   I thought that this was, in part at least, a testimony to better medical practices and aged care in many parts of the world.  Along similar lines, in terms [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/04/zimbabwe-hiv-and-behavioural-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Not under my roof”</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/04/%e2%80%9cnot-under-my-roof%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/04/%e2%80%9cnot-under-my-roof%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan A professor of sociology wrote a week or so ago in the New York Timesthat American family life might be much improved if parents in the US were more like those in the Netherlands who &#8212; typically, it is implied &#8212; allow their teenage daughters to have their boyfriends sleep over in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/04/%e2%80%9cnot-under-my-roof%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Men who buy sex commit more crimes</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/07/26/study-men-who-buy-sex-commit-more-crimes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/07/26/study-men-who-buy-sex-commit-more-crimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adultery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prostitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This doesn&#8217;t surprise me: BOSTON (Reuters) &#8211; Men who pay for sex are more likely than men who do not pay for sex to commit a variety of offenses including violent crimes against women, according to research conducted in the Boston area. The study, released this week, was based on interviews with 202 men conducted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/07/26/study-men-who-buy-sex-commit-more-crimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/20 queries in 0.033 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-11 00:47:24 -->
