<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; Sex Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/category/sex-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:02:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Changing the world: one college campus at a time</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/21/changing-the-world-one-college-campus-at-a-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/21/changing-the-world-one-college-campus-at-a-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hook-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hooking up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Joanna Hyatt This past summer, I spent a fantastic weekend as one of about 40 international students who attended the Ruth Institute&#8217;s &#8220;It Takes a Family&#8221; 2011 conference (ITAF). While there, I met two students from the University of Pittsburgh, Joseph Petrich and Alex Souchuns. Both are involved in the Anscombe Society on campus, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/21/changing-the-world-one-college-campus-at-a-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex-ed classes and assault on our children&#8217;s innocence (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/sex-ed-classes-and-assault-on-our-childrens-innocence-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/sex-ed-classes-and-assault-on-our-childrens-innocence-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex ed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Michael L. Brown Caution: Contains descriptions that some may find offensive. As outrageous as it is to hear about the new sex-ed curriculum for New York City schools, beginning with middle schools, there are some school districts for which the program does not start early enough. And so, in June 2010, the Provincetown, Massachusetts, school [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/07/sex-ed-classes-and-assault-on-our-childrens-innocence-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex-ed classes and the assault on our children&#8217;s innocence (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/05/sex-ed-classes-and-the-assault-on-our-childrens-innocence-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/05/sex-ed-classes-and-the-assault-on-our-childrens-innocence-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Dr. Michael L. Brown Caution: Contains descriptions that some may find offensive. Did you hear about New York City&#8217;s comprehensive drug education program for all students in middle school and high school? The teachers inform the students that abstaining from drug use is best, but since it&#8217;s impossible to stop them from doing drugs, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/12/05/sex-ed-classes-and-the-assault-on-our-childrens-innocence-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is abstinence education working?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/is-abstinence-education-working/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/is-abstinence-education-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charlie Butts Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America (CWA) says the truth is that teen birth rates have been dropping for several years now, and the stats from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) are good news. &#8220;[Teen birth rates] dropped nine percent. This is about the third year in a row when these have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/is-abstinence-education-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So this is what they mean by “comprehensive sex education”?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/so-this-is-what-they-mean-by-%e2%80%9ccomprehensive-sex-education%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/so-this-is-what-they-mean-by-%e2%80%9ccomprehensive-sex-education%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 21:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan The New York Times yesterday published a preview of a weekend magazine article called “Teaching Good Sex” &#8212; a long and detailed account of how one teacher, with full support from his elite school, is promoting sexual pleasure as a goal for 17-year-olds and even younger teenagers. Frankly, it’s appalling. But it’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/11/25/so-this-is-what-they-mean-by-%e2%80%9ccomprehensive-sex-education%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parental rights, schools and rival moral visions</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/parental-rights-schools-and-rival-moral-visions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/parental-rights-schools-and-rival-moral-visions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 04:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Sheila Liaugminas In the public schools, parents are losing more rights with more frequency these days. The California school system has been in the news a lot in recent months for its change in curriculum to make it not only gay-friendly, but featured. …California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law SB 48, which dictates [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/parental-rights-schools-and-rival-moral-visions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parental rights come before sex-ed goals, says Robert P George</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/parental-rights-come-before-sex-ed-goals-says-robert-p-george/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/parental-rights-come-before-sex-ed-goals-says-robert-p-george/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Carolyn Moynihan The introduction of mandatory sex education classes for middle school pupils (10- to 12-year-olds) in New York has brought criticism from a leading US academic. Robert P George, a professor of politics at Princeton University, and one of his doctoral students, Melissa Moschella, have had an op-ed on sex education and parental [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/24/parental-rights-come-before-sex-ed-goals-says-robert-p-george/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kids want to hear about life and love from parents</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/04/kids-want-to-hear-about-life-and-love-from-parents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/04/kids-want-to-hear-about-life-and-love-from-parents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan There was an uproar in New Zealand recently about sex education when a father told the NZ Herald he had pulled his son out of sex education because the teacher had told his class that anal and oral sex were alternatives to intercourse and that it was okay to play with a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/10/04/kids-want-to-hear-about-life-and-love-from-parents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex survey now a standardized test for youngsters</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/09/21/sex-survey-now-a-standardized-test-for-youngsters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/09/21/sex-survey-now-a-standardized-test-for-youngsters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Bob Kellogg Beginning next spring, fifth-, eighth-, and tenth-grade students in the DC schools will take a 50-question sexual education standardized test. But Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council (FRC) says that is raising some concerns. &#8220;Bringing it to the level of actually having standardized testing means that not only will students be given this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/09/21/sex-survey-now-a-standardized-test-for-youngsters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update:  CA schools and SB 48 (LGBT history curriculum)</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/09/07/update-ca-schools-and-sb-48-lgbt-history-curriculum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/09/07/update-ca-schools-and-sb-48-lgbt-history-curriculum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in July, the California legislature passed SB 48.  It mandates that all public schools must include positive discussions of the sexual orientations of transgender, bisexual, and gay Americans when teaching their contributions to history.  This includes rewriting text books and using supplemental discussion materials. Now, a group of citizens hopes to use California&#8217;s referendum [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/09/07/update-ca-schools-and-sb-48-lgbt-history-curriculum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr. Miriam Grossman on The O&#8217;Reilly Factor</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/18/dr-miriam-grossman-on-the-oreilly-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/18/dr-miriam-grossman-on-the-oreilly-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Norrie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miriam Grossman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O'Reilly Factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex ed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Miriam Grossman, campus psychiatrist at UCLA, author of Unprotected and You&#8217;re Teaching My Child What?, and keynote speaker for Ruth Institute&#8217;s 2010 &#8220;It Takes a Family&#8221; Conference, appears on FoxNews&#8217;s The O&#8217;Reilly Factor to discuss New York state&#8217;s requirement of sexual education classes for very young children. Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com Found [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/18/dr-miriam-grossman-on-the-oreilly-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Ed Mandates and Children&#8217;s Innocence</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/17/sex-ed-mandates-and-childrens-innocence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/17/sex-ed-mandates-and-childrens-innocence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re excited to see that the author quotes our friend Dr. Miriam Grossman, who was our keynote speaker at last year&#8217;s &#8220;It Takes a Family&#8221; Conference, the Ruth Institute&#8217;s annual young adult conference. by Greg Pfundstein New York&#8217;s new sex education mandate excludes abstinence-only options and forces all city school children to learn about &#8220;safe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/17/sex-ed-mandates-and-childrens-innocence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Education in NYC Schools Becomes Mandatory</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/10/sex-education-in-nyc-schools-becomes-mandatory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/10/sex-education-in-nyc-schools-becomes-mandatory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=8204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Todd Starnes Students in New York City will be required to take sex education classes that include lessons on how to use a condom – a curriculum that the head of the school system said is long overdue. It’s the first time in nearly two decades that middle and high school students will be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/08/10/sex-education-in-nyc-schools-becomes-mandatory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love and marriage in pre (sexual) revolutionary England</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/06/28/love-and-marriage-in-pre-sexual-revolutionary-england/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/06/28/love-and-marriage-in-pre-sexual-revolutionary-england/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual revolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Mariette Ulrich In the 1980’s, my hopelessly outdated mom counselled me not to kiss a boy on the first date. I tell my daughters not to kiss (or, for that matter, date) anyone they wouldn’t be prepared to marry. As someone who espouses values possibly more old-fashioned than those held by my pre-sexual-revolution era [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/06/28/love-and-marriage-in-pre-sexual-revolutionary-england/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you live within driving distance of Sacramento?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/06/18/do-you-live-within-driving-distance-of-sacramento/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/06/18/do-you-live-within-driving-distance-of-sacramento/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will be a hearing next Wednesday, June 22, on SB 48&#8211;the bill that would require California schools to teach, not merely the accomplishments of historical figures, but their sexual preferences as well.  It would apply to students in kindergarten on up. If you can&#8217;t attend the hearing, call your legislator. From Bill May: …SB [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/06/18/do-you-live-within-driving-distance-of-sacramento/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And in CA:  Senate bill mandates gay history in schools</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/21/and-in-ca-senate-bill-mandates-gay-history-in-schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/21/and-in-ca-senate-bill-mandates-gay-history-in-schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 04:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this news on the Women of Grace website: LifeSiteNews.com is reporting that a proposed new law in California that recently passed out of Committee will mandate pro-gay indoctrination of all public school students by forcing the curricula to incorporate the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans. Known as SB 48, it was introduced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/21/and-in-ca-senate-bill-mandates-gay-history-in-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In MA:  &#8220;Reach kids&#8230;before it&#8217;s too late&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/21/in-ma-reach-kids-before-its-too-late/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/21/in-ma-reach-kids-before-its-too-late/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 03:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexually Transmitted Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an op-ed from the Boston Herald, we learn the following: Pay attention parents! It&#8217;s spring. And before you know it, Massachusetts public schools will begin their yearly sex-ed lessons for kids as young as 5. Of course, they won&#8217;t call it &#8220;sex ed.&#8221; They&#8217;ll call it &#8220;health.&#8221; But a rose by any other name [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/21/in-ma-reach-kids-before-its-too-late/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood&#8217;s Cobalt Blue Sex Education</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/16/planned-parenthoods-cobalt-blue-sex-education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/16/planned-parenthoods-cobalt-blue-sex-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 20:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex ed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Chuck Rogér American philosopher Thomas Sowell wrote that &#8220;the vision of the anointed [has] achieved a sacrosanct status, hermetically sealed off from the contaminating influence of facts.&#8221;[1]  There are few places in America with as dense a concentration of anointed critters as Santa Fe, New Mexico.  The city is famous for its art and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/16/planned-parenthoods-cobalt-blue-sex-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teach girls to say “no” &#8211; British MP</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/10/teach-girls-to-say-%e2%80%9cno%e2%80%9d-british-mp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/10/teach-girls-to-say-%e2%80%9cno%e2%80%9d-british-mp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 18:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wowsers. Some people have totally lost their minds, particularly regarding the tidbit in the very last paragraph. by Carolyn Moynihan British secondary schools are required by law to teach the biological facts of human reproduction in science lessons, but students themselves often say the instruction given is too biological. The facts also speak for themselves: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/05/10/teach-girls-to-say-%e2%80%9cno%e2%80%9d-british-mp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incarcerated parents&#8217; treatment &#8216;appalling&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/30/incarcerated-parents-treatment-appalling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/30/incarcerated-parents-treatment-appalling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Bumpas &#8211; OneNewsNow - Some German parents continue to be jailed for protecting their children&#8217;s Christian beliefs. Five sets of parents in a German town have been punished for refusing to allow their elementary school-aged children to participate in school sex-education programs (see earlier article). &#8220;[The children are] being put through an interactive sex-education [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/30/incarcerated-parents-treatment-appalling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/20 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-11 00:17:25 -->
