Archive

Archive for the ‘Marriage’ Category

Marriage is different from cohabitation – Canadian court

January 26th, 2013 Comments off

by Carolyn Moynihan

A press release just in from a MercatorNet partner:

January 25, 2013 (Ottawa) - Today the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that Quebec can exclude cohabiting couples from receiving spousal support in the event of relationship breakdown.  Read more…

Print Friendly

Dr J at McGeorge law school

January 25th, 2013 Comments off

Courtney Martin, President of the Federalist Society chapter with Dr. J after her talk to McGeorge Law School on campus of the University of the Pacific, on Thursday evening. (James Madison in the photo/podium sign!)

Print Friendly

Dr J testifies in Rhode Island

January 24th, 2013 Comments off

Print Friendly

Dr J at the Rhode Island state legislature

January 21st, 2013 Comments off

Print Friendly

Dr. J interviews Dr. Dale Kuehne, Part 2

January 17th, 2013 Comments off

Print Friendly

Not Dead Yet

January 11th, 2013 Comments off

On Sunday, with the Supreme Court set to rule on same-sex marriage, George Will ignored polling data and ballot-box results — both support marriage as it has always been in America — to claim on ABC’s “This Week” that there is an “emerging consensus” in support of redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships. Will went further: “Quite literally, the opposition to gay marriage is dying. It’s old people.” Read more…

Print Friendly

The Future of Marriage

January 8th, 2013 Comments off
Ryan T. Anderson, Guest Contributor · December 14, 2012 at 8:13am

This week’s Ricochet posts on marriage have made a sustained argument about what marriage is and why marriage matters. For a more detailed treatment of these issues, look to my new book, co-authored with Sherif Girgis and Robert P. George, What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense. Read more…

Print Friendly
Categories: Marriage Tags:

“Monogamy, Exclusivity, and Permanence?”

January 5th, 2013 Comments off
Ryan T. Anderson, Guest Contributor · December 13, 2012 at 1:08pm

Yesterday’s post explained government’s policy interest in marriage. Government needs to get marriage policy right, because it shapes the norms associated with this most fundamental relationship.

Redefining marriage would abandon the norm of male-female sexual complementarity as an essential characteristic of marriage. Making that optional would also make other essential characteristics—like monogamy, exclusivity and permanency—optional, as my co-authors and I argue in our new book, What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense. Read more…

Print Friendly
Categories: Marriage Tags: ,

Why Is Government in the Marriage Business?

December 27th, 2012 Comments off

Yesterday’s post focused on what marriage is. Today’s explores why the government recognizes marriage in the first place. As my co-authors and I argue in our new book, What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense, virtually every political community has regulated male-female sexual relationships. Why? Not because government cares about romance as such. It cares about male-female sexual relationships because these alone produce new human beings. Read more…

Print Friendly

The Bible v. Gene Robinson: how about a real Bible scholar, not a comedian?

December 21st, 2012 Comments off

gagnon stewart

Morse

Print Friendly