<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; Homosexuality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/category/homosexuality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:23:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Marriage and the Reign of Judges</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/marriage-and-the-reign-of-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/marriage-and-the-reign-of-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Matthew J. Franck
The latest decision from our judicial overlords on same-sex marriage spells trouble for republican constitutionalism and the institution of marriage.
The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was grounded on a fear of judges run amok. This past Thursday, federal district court judge Joseph Tauro of Boston justified this fear when he struck down [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/marriage-and-the-reign-of-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois professor fired for doing his job</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/illinois-professor-fired-for-doing-his-job/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/illinois-professor-fired-for-doing-his-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a crock, and, undoubtedly, a double standard.
by Sheila Liaugminas
This story is picking up press, and it should. Freedom of speech is at the heart of it, as is the effort yet again to attack legitimate expression of belief, expressed…where? In a classroom setting that fosters intellecutal inquiry and critical thinking skills?
Not exactly.
The University [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/illinois-professor-fired-for-doing-his-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEA Drag Queen Caucus???!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/16/nea-drag-queen-caucus-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/16/nea-drag-queen-caucus-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When this was brought to my attention (look on the third page) all I could think is “You have got to be kidding&#8230;”
But because we are by now such a thoroughly (indeed absurdly) non-judgmental, morally neutral, nonsensically ‘tolerant’, hyper-inclusive, politically correct society there are bound to be those who insist that the National ‘Education’ Association [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/16/nea-drag-queen-caucus-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Hillary pushing gay rights upon Africa?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/why-is-hillary-pushing-gay-rights-upon-africa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/why-is-hillary-pushing-gay-rights-upon-africa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clinton&#8217;s &#8220;first concern for Africa is how LGBT persons are treated on the continent. . . it is fortunate that the US does not have an embassy in Mogadishu, because if the word got round that THIS was the African priority for the present US administration, there would be a repetition of Black Hawk Down.&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/why-is-hillary-pushing-gay-rights-upon-africa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The other story about same-sex parenting</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/the-other-story-about-same-sex-parenting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/the-other-story-about-same-sex-parenting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Walter R Schumm
Research showing the risks of lesbian and gay parenting is ignored in the race to make a political case.
There is an inherent risk that anyone who has anything to say about gay male or lesbian parenting, no matter how cautious, will be misunderstood at best and vilified at worst. Nevertheless, the mission [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/the-other-story-about-same-sex-parenting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RI Statement in Support of Argentina</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/ri-statement-in-support-of-argentina/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/ri-statement-in-support-of-argentina/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Congress of Argentina will be voting on Same Sex Marriage tomorrow, Wednesday, July 14th. Today, supporters of natural marriage will hold a major rally in Buenos Aires. The lower house of the Argentine Congress approved a same sex marriage bill in May: now the measure goes to their Senate. The coalition supporting natural marriage [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/ri-statement-in-support-of-argentina/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court: Christian group can&#8217;t bar gays, get funding</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/court-christian-group-cant-bar-gays-get-funding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/court-christian-group-cant-bar-gays-get-funding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By JESSE J. HOLLAND (AP)
WASHINGTON — An ideologically split Supreme Court ruled Monday that a law school can legally deny recognition to a Christian student group that won&#8217;t let gays join, with one justice saying that the First Amendment does not require a public university to validate or support the group&#8217;s &#8220;discriminatory practices.&#8221;
The court turned [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/court-christian-group-cant-bar-gays-get-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Says Evangelist Can Preach at Gay-Pride Festival</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/judge-says-evangelist-can-preach-at-gay-pride-festival/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/judge-says-evangelist-can-preach-at-gay-pride-festival/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay pride]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By DANNY YADRON
CHICAGO—A Wisconsin evangelist will be able to distribute Bibles and discuss sin this weekend at a Minneapolis gay-pride festival, the result of a federal court ruling Friday that could spark a First Amendment battle in the Midwest.
Organizers of the Twin Cities Pride festival had sought to bar Brian Johnson, 53 years old, from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/judge-says-evangelist-can-preach-at-gay-pride-festival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The destructive fruits of sexual politics</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/the-destructive-fruits-of-sexual-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/the-destructive-fruits-of-sexual-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Stephen Baskerville
It may be no accident that Dale McAlpine, the Christian arrested for street preaching in England, was nabbed for his views on homosexuality. As Melanie Phillips points out in the Daily Mail, the preponderance of cases in what she calls Britain&#8217;s &#8220;attempt to stamp out Christianity&#8221; involve homosexuality.
This is also true in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/11/the-destructive-fruits-of-sexual-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fred on Hooking Up&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/04/fred-on-hooking-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/04/fred-on-hooking-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 02:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arlemagne1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fathers' Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hook-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Legalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hooking up]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fred Reed writes some provocative stuff.  I often disagree with him, but he&#8217;s smart as a whip and always interesting.  In this article, he takes on hooking up.
I see where women, or college girls anyway, are honking and blowing most fierce about how they don’t like the way sex works nowadays. Yeah. It seems that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/04/fred-on-hooking-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-Sex Marriage and Formal Discrimination</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/same-sex-marriage-and-formal-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/same-sex-marriage-and-formal-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by David Schaengold
Another reason the analogy between same-sex marriage and interracial marriage fails.
Recently in Public Discourse, Francis Beckwith argued that the frequently invoked analogy between same-sex marriage and interracial marriage is flawed, and should not be used by advocates for the legal recognition of same-sex unions. As Beckwith wrote, this analogy is freighted with enormous [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/same-sex-marriage-and-formal-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage on trial</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/19/marriage-on-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/19/marriage-on-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Might as well post this as well.
by Sheila Liaugminas
Sometimes, the Proposition 8 battle seems surreal. But then, so do other serious, emotional and intense conflicts playing out in the nation’s courts and city halls and classrooms and media, over what we knew not long ago as core Judeo-Christian traditional values.
The closing argument by Prop 8 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/19/marriage-on-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Troubling theories about childhood innocence</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/18/troubling-theories-about-childhood-innocence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/18/troubling-theories-about-childhood-innocence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Troubling, indeed, to think that three and four-year-olds calling &#8220;kissing crocs&#8221; one boy and one girl is &#8220;a problem.&#8221; I don&#8217;t call that a problem; I call it normal! Let them be normal. If that&#8217;s the way they&#8217;re thinking naturally, than it&#8217;s natural. Why try to mess with them?
by Carolyn Moynihan
Sexuality engineers may be coming to a childcare [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/18/troubling-theories-about-childhood-innocence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Moral Issues</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/12/four-moral-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/12/four-moral-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 23:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assisted Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Euthanasia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hook-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Roback Morse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assisted suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Gallup&#8217;s recent Values and Beliefs survey, Americans are &#8220;sharply divided&#8221; on 4 issues: doctor-assisted suicide, homosexual relations, abortion, and out-of-wedlock childbearing.  Close to half of us perceive these activities in particular as &#8220;morally acceptable;&#8221; close to half disagree and find them &#8220;morally wrong.&#8221;  (The survey asked about 16 behaviors; these were the most [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/12/four-moral-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PERSPECTIVES: Gay Men Only?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/12/perspectives-gay-men-only/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/12/perspectives-gay-men-only/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Roback Morse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse&#124;Published Date: April 04, 2010 at The Chuck Colson Center for Christian Worldview.
Equal, but…
“Kids Do as Well with Same Sex Parents,” the headlines screamed. I crossed swords with Judith Stacey, one of the authors of this most recent study, at a debate at Bowling Green State a few years ago. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/12/perspectives-gay-men-only/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much does the lesbian parenting study really tell us?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/10/how-much-does-the-lesbian-parenting-study-really-tell-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/10/how-much-does-the-lesbian-parenting-study-really-tell-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 19:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carolyn Moynihan
Right on cue for &#8220;lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender pride month&#8221; the journal of the American Academy of pediatrics has published a study purporting to show that the children of lesbian couples “do better than their peers” on some measures.
The data comes from the United States National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study and is based [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/10/how-much-does-the-lesbian-parenting-study-really-tell-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Like Everyone Else: Same-Sex Couples and Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/05/27/not-like-everyone-else-same-sex-couples-and-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/05/27/not-like-everyone-else-same-sex-couples-and-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This one&#8217;s sure to earn some comments.
By: Chuck Colson
We’ve warned before that same-sex &#8220;marriage&#8221; will weaken the foundations of traditional marriage. New research shows us why.
Same-sex couples just want the right to be married like everyone else, or so the argument goes. They call it a civil right. You could hardly find a more innocuous [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/05/27/not-like-everyone-else-same-sex-couples-and-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Class Parents?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/05/25/second-class-parents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/05/25/second-class-parents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 21:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Roback Morse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse. Originally pubished at National Catholic Register, March 22,2010.
“Domestic partnerships make us second-class citizens. We want marriage, just like everyone else.”
This is the constant refrain of the marriage-redefinition advocates. Drawing a legal distinction, any legal distinction, between same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples is unfair and amounts to ill treatment of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/05/25/second-class-parents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partners and rights</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/05/19/partners-and-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/05/19/partners-and-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s just keep stoking the fire, shall we? Here&#8217;s another voice to add to the discussion.
by Sheila Liaugminas
Same-sex marriage activists have built a movement to re-define ‘family’ on the premise that homosexual partners are denied rights like hospital visitation unless specifically provided by law. But is that premise true?
This is an emotional debate, but what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/05/19/partners-and-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Health Hazards of Political Correctness</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/27/the-health-hazards-of-political-correctness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/27/the-health-hazards-of-political-correctness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ginny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexually Transmitted Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunking MSM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new data analysis from the Centers for Disease Control shows, once again, that homosexual intercourse is hazardous to the health:
The Centers for Disease Control recently released information from a data analysis regarding the  transmission of sexually transmitted diseases.  Presented at the CDC&#8217;s  National STD Prevention Conference, the data indicated that the rate of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/27/the-health-hazards-of-political-correctness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/19 queries in 0.044 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2010-07-30 21:25:39 -->