<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/category/children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PA school offers Plan B vending machine</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/pa-school-offers-plan-b-vending-machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/pa-school-offers-plan-b-vending-machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morning after pill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Charlie Butts Shippensburg Universityin Pennsylvania is now selling the &#8220;morning-after&#8221; pill via a vending machine. A pro-family group in that state believes that sends the wrong message to students. [Ya think?!] For $25, people with access to campus health services at Shippensburg can buy Plan B from a machine, just like they would a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/pa-school-offers-plan-b-vending-machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daycare must focus on child, not adult needs, says new report</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/daycare-must-focus-on-child-not-adult-needs-says-new-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/daycare-must-focus-on-child-not-adult-needs-says-new-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[day care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan A new report on daycare and child wellbeing in New Zealand has had a predictably stand-offish reception from the media and professional groups so far, although parents posting their opinions online are dividedabout its claims. The report, Who Cares, published by lobby group Family First and written by British psychologist and author [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/09/daycare-must-focus-on-child-not-adult-needs-says-new-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About gender</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/about-gender/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/about-gender/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender differences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Here&#8217;s a little food for thought about gender &#8211; a quote from a long article in Prospect magazine in which philosopher Roger Scruton reviews three books contributing to the nature-nurture debate. This quote is from a section in which he argues, against the view of the philosopher Jesse Prinz, that biology does [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/07/about-gender/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How divorce ruins children’s lives</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/how-divorce-ruins-children%e2%80%99s-lives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/how-divorce-ruins-children%e2%80%99s-lives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by William West A new study on divorce, looking at the complete spectrum of research on the subject, confirms what most people already know – even if they are not willing to admit it: divorce causes “irreparable harm” to the whole family, but  particularly to the children. There have been plenty of individual studies exposing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/how-divorce-ruins-children%e2%80%99s-lives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More time online = less happiness among girls</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/more-time-online-less-happiness-among-girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/more-time-online-less-happiness-among-girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[girls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan Girls who spend a lot of time using multimedia seem are less happy and socially comfortable than peers who spend less time on screens, a study from Stanford University suggests. Researchers came to that conclusion after analysing an online survey taken by 3,400 8- to 12-year-olds. The survey was offered through Discovery [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/more-time-online-less-happiness-among-girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Lesson in how NOT to talk to a priest</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/a-lesson-in-how-not-to-talk-to-a-priest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/a-lesson-in-how-not-to-talk-to-a-priest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting is funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At my daughter’s baptism, the priest asked, “What name do you give this child?” We told him, and when the priest repeated the name, my four-year-old son pointed violently at the priest and yelled, Keep reading.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/02/06/a-lesson-in-how-not-to-talk-to-a-priest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parental Manipulation, 101</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/26/parental-manipulation-101/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/26/parental-manipulation-101/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting is funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When my two-year-old daughter was throwing a fit, I took hold of her and looked her in the eyes, saying, “You WILL talk to Mommy nicely.” With no hesitation, she got three inches from my face, tilted her head to the side and said Keep reading.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/26/parental-manipulation-101/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Author gives another look at purity</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/author-gives-another-look-at-purity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/author-gives-another-look-at-purity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chastity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Bill Bumpas She&#8217;s not the first one to challenge teens to remain pure before marriage.  But author Elsa Kok Colopy tells OneNewsNow what she&#8217;s talking about in her book is real purity &#8212; not just about a bunch of&#8221; do&#8217;s and don&#8217;ts.&#8221; &#8220;The book is titled Pure Love, Pure Life because I just believe [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/author-gives-another-look-at-purity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open marriage? A terrible idea for kids</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/open-marriage-a-terrible-idea-for-kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/open-marriage-a-terrible-idea-for-kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Radicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan US Presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich was accused by ex-wife number two last week of wanting, at one stage, an &#8220;open marriage&#8221; in order to accommodate an affair he was having with present wife (number three). The New York Times has rounded up some experts to discuss the merits of such arangements. Brad [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/23/open-marriage-a-terrible-idea-for-kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>He sings like an angel</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/19/he-sings-like-an-angel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/19/he-sings-like-an-angel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting is funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My two-year-old son was singing, or rather, belting out, the Alleluia in his best voice. The only problem was that he replaced the word “Alleluia” with&#8230; Keep reading.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/19/he-sings-like-an-angel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we free to speak about parenting research?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/are-we-free-to-speak-about-parenting-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/are-we-free-to-speak-about-parenting-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Carolyn Moynihan It’s difficult today to say anything in favour of the intact, married family without putting somebody’s nose out of joint. Last week it was a blogger at the LBGT site ThinkProgress who took umbrage at a comment by Focus on the Family’s Glenn Stanton. I’ll let Mr Stanton tell you how from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/are-we-free-to-speak-about-parenting-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A noisy week for parenting studies</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/a-noisy-week-for-parenting-studies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/a-noisy-week-for-parenting-studies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunking MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Roback Morse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all this week, there was a big (about 5,000 observations) sophisticated (University of Chicago Business School) study of bad behavior in little boys. Conclusion: little boys benefit substantially from living with both their biological parents. The second study was a little (78 observations) simplistic (unrepresentative sample, ideologically motivated researchers) of the Quality of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/18/a-noisy-week-for-parenting-studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with lesbian parenting studies</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/17/what-undecided-voters-on-tv-and-the-parade-of-artificial-insemination-studies-have-in-common/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/17/what-undecided-voters-on-tv-and-the-parade-of-artificial-insemination-studies-have-in-common/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunking MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Michael Worley, First year law student at J. Reuben Clark Law School at Brigham Young University, and a 2011 graduate of the Ruth Institute It Takes a Family to Raise a Village program. It is common knowledge that TV reports don’t tell the whole story.  Frequently a group of 75 undecided voters gather to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/17/what-undecided-voters-on-tv-and-the-parade-of-artificial-insemination-studies-have-in-common/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the West’s Fertility War Has Left Women at Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/how-the-west%e2%80%99s-fertility-war-has-left-women-at-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/how-the-west%e2%80%99s-fertility-war-has-left-women-at-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Roback Morse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsletter articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender imbalance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender selection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=10001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Jennifer Roback Morse This article was first published at familyinamerica.org on January 10, 2012. Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys over Girls, and the Consequences of a World Full of Men Mara Hvistendahl Public Affairs, 2011; 314 pages, $26.99 This brave and timely book has many strengths and one glaring, but understandable, weakness. The strength of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/how-the-west%e2%80%99s-fertility-war-has-left-women-at-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dying teen’s video inspires millions</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/dying-teen%e2%80%99s-video-inspires-millions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/dying-teen%e2%80%99s-video-inspires-millions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Katie Hinderer I often get asked why I like social media so much. Parents are concerned at the amount of time their children spend online and the relationships that are suffering as a result. They see the constant need to be in the know and the increasingly short attention spans as something detrimental. And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/dying-teen%e2%80%99s-video-inspires-millions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to compensate for lost fertility?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/how-to-compensate-for-lost-fertility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/how-to-compensate-for-lost-fertility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[african americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eugenics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forced sterilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Shannon Roberts Past Eugenics and sterilisation programs in the United States are coming back to bite them, with North Carolina currently the first State to address compensation for victims. According to the North Carolina Justice for Sterilization Victims Foundation, at one time 31 states in the United States had government-run eugenics programs. In North [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/how-to-compensate-for-lost-fertility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie morality is plummeting</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/movie-morality-is-plummeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/movie-morality-is-plummeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[popular culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexualization of teens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by William West Film censors are allowing teens to access much more explicit content and few parents seem to care A time traveller from the 20th Century would very likely be shocked by how standards have plummeted in the film industry in a little over a decade – particularly with movies aimed at the teen [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/movie-morality-is-plummeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cruel genius children?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/cruel-genius-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/cruel-genius-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting is funny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting is funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Random chance? Prank of the fitness gods? Yes, I know I’m getting big, but seeing this on my fridge is just spooky. See it to believe it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/16/cruel-genius-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Left-wing rhetorical strategies: mischaracterize your  opponents’ statements</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/10/left-wing-rhetorical-strategies-mischaracterize-your-opponents%e2%80%99-statements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/10/left-wing-rhetorical-strategies-mischaracterize-your-opponents%e2%80%99-statements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tactics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of our continuing series of posts on identifying the rhetorical tactics of the opponents of marriage. This strategy of mischaracterizing your opponents’ statements is extremely common, and takes several different forms.  Today we are going to deal with just one: being outraged over a statement you attribute to your opponent, but which [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/10/left-wing-rhetorical-strategies-mischaracterize-your-opponents%e2%80%99-statements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As I was saying&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/06/as-i-was-saying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/06/as-i-was-saying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Roback Morse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=9918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Family Research Council has caught up with the Ruth Institute. I shouldn&#8217;t gloat, but the big DC-Beltway Think Tank has just discovered the Presumption of Paternity. Out here in San Diego, as far from the Beltway as you can get and still be in the Continental US, we have been saying this stuff, literally, for years: Same-sex [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2012/01/06/as-i-was-saying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/18 queries in 0.085 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-10 21:18:39 -->
