<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; leland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/author/leland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>National Review Online’s Case for Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/09/07/national-review-online%e2%80%99s-case-for-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/09/07/national-review-online%e2%80%99s-case-for-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The editors at National Review Online have posted an excellent article (The Case for Marriage) that quite eloquently refutes the arguments most commonly made for same-sex &#8216;marriage&#8217; and concisely, but thoroughly, describes the damage that will be done to society if we allow marriage to be deconstructed. If it is true, as we are constantly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/09/07/national-review-online%e2%80%99s-case-for-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Same-Sex &#8216;Marriage&#8217; Already Undermines the First Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/08/02/how-same-sex-marriage-already-undermines-the-first-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/08/02/how-same-sex-marriage-already-undermines-the-first-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. We&#8217;ve discussed on this blog before how if same-sex &#8216;marriage&#8217; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/08/02/how-same-sex-marriage-already-undermines-the-first-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not that same-sex &#8216;marriage&#8217; will scramble family structure or anything&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/not-that-same-sex-marriage-will-scramble-family-structure-or-anything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/not-that-same-sex-marriage-will-scramble-family-structure-or-anything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Link: Are three parents sometimes better than two? B.C.&#8217;s radical idea]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/21/not-that-same-sex-marriage-will-scramble-family-structure-or-anything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEA Drag Queen Caucus???!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/16/nea-drag-queen-caucus-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/16/nea-drag-queen-caucus-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 01:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay and Lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When this was brought to my attention (look on the third page) all I could think is “You have got to be kidding&#8230;” But because we are by now such a thoroughly (indeed absurdly) non-judgmental, morally neutral, nonsensically ‘tolerant’, hyper-inclusive, politically correct society there are bound to be those who insist that the National ‘Education’ [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/16/nea-drag-queen-caucus-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruth Institute called an &#8216;Anti-Gay&#8217; Public Policy Institute Stepping Out of the Shadows</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/14/ruth-institute-called-an-anti-gay-public-policy-institute-stepping-out-of-the-shadows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/14/ruth-institute-called-an-anti-gay-public-policy-institute-stepping-out-of-the-shadows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 02:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found this Buzzflash Blog report on Ruth Institute while doing my daily googles. (Gayapolis News also linked to the piece.) Looks like we’re still making the right kind of enemies, but for the record, RI is not &#8220;anti-gay,&#8221; just anti-gay marriage. My favorite line from the review: “&#8230;Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse, also known on [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/14/ruth-institute-called-an-anti-gay-public-policy-institute-stepping-out-of-the-shadows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ending Abortion Webcast</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/ending-abortion-webcast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/ending-abortion-webcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently (Saturday, June 10th) there was an awesome webcast called Ending Abortion. It’s well worth checking out. You can download any (or all) of the ten hour-long sessions as an MP3 to your computer or ipod and listen to each at your leisure.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/13/ending-abortion-webcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom Is Not Enough: The Moynihan Report</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/07/freedom-is-not-enough-the-moynihan-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/07/freedom-is-not-enough-the-moynihan-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 04:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[african americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[out-of-wedlock childbearing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monday (July 5th) I listened to a broadcast on the Diane Rehm Show of an interview with James T. Patterson, author of Freedom Is Not Enough: The Moynihan Report and America&#8217;s Struggle over Black Family Life from LBJ to Obama. That title was already on my long (long&#8230;) wish-list of books I’d like to buy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/07/freedom-is-not-enough-the-moynihan-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kids First, Marriage Later &#8211; If Ever???</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/04/kids-first-marriage-later-if-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/04/kids-first-marriage-later-if-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 02:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=3101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of its Newly Wed In America series, National Public Radio today aired a segment titled Kids First, Marriage Later &#8212; If Ever. A couple of quotes: &#8220;Many of these parents are children of divorce&#8230; Today, these parents say they&#8217;d rather raise a child alone or with multiple partners than risk putting that child [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/07/04/kids-first-marriage-later-if-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-Sex Couples Will Be Taxed Less Than Heterosexual Couples???</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/same-sex-couples-will-be-taxed-less-than-heterosexual-couples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/same-sex-couples-will-be-taxed-less-than-heterosexual-couples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This LifeSiteNews article describes how a recent ruling by the IRS means that in some cases same-sex domestic partners in California (and a couple of other states) could get a better deal on their taxes than a comparable heterosexual couple would have available to them. Most tax experts seem to think this new regulation is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/same-sex-couples-will-be-taxed-less-than-heterosexual-couples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Kids Being Sexualized at School</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/more-kids-being-sexualized-at-school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/more-kids-being-sexualized-at-school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Helena Independent Record posted a letter to the editor June 27th that cites some examples of the kind of sexual indoctrination that often goes on in our public schools. (“In first grade the concepts of homosexuality will be introduced; in third grade, same-sex marriage. By fifth grade, our children will be taught the difference [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/more-kids-being-sexualized-at-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LGBT’s Don’t Sound So Politically Powerless To Me&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/lgbt%e2%80%99s-don%e2%80%99t-sound-so-politically-powerless-to-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/lgbt%e2%80%99s-don%e2%80%99t-sound-so-politically-powerless-to-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider carefully the boasts made in this recent San Francisco Chronicle article about what a politically potent interest group the LGBT community has become 40 years after the Stonewall Riots (at least according to the LGBT community themselves&#8230;) Then try to reconcile those boasts with the arguments made at the Prop 8 Trial that same-sex [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/lgbt%e2%80%99s-don%e2%80%99t-sound-so-politically-powerless-to-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finally! Some judicial common sense (and sound reasoning) on what qualifies one as a parent</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/finally-some-judicial-common-sense-and-sound-reasoning-on-what-qualifies-one-as-a-parent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/finally-some-judicial-common-sense-and-sound-reasoning-on-what-qualifies-one-as-a-parent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The title of the article says it all: Wisconsin Court Tells Lesbian: Legal Adoption, Not ‘Nurturing,’ Gives Parental Rights But it&#8217;s worth reading the entire article anyway. Maybe we&#8217;re starting to make some progress after all.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/29/finally-some-judicial-common-sense-and-sound-reasoning-on-what-qualifies-one-as-a-parent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Determines the Results of Same-Sex Marriage Ballot Measures?</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/18/what-determines-the-results-of-same-sex-marriage-ballot-measures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/18/what-determines-the-results-of-same-sex-marriage-ballot-measures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So there’s a new study out entitled Findings from a Decade of Polling on Ballot Measures Regarding the Legal Status of Same-Sex Couples. The two main questions focused on in the study are: What effect did the campaign have on the outcome of the election? and How predictable was the outcome of the election? To [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/18/what-determines-the-results-of-same-sex-marriage-ballot-measures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prop 8 Trial Closing Arguments</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/17/prop-8-trial-closing-arguments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/17/prop-8-trial-closing-arguments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 02:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8 Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did anyone watch (well, read actually) the closing arguments for Perry v. Schwarzenegger? For what it&#8217;s worth, this blog looked to me like the best place to watch the proceedings live. (Per the court&#8217;s ruling, there was no video or audio of the trial available.) Yes I know, that website advocates overturning Proposition 8. But [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/06/17/prop-8-trial-closing-arguments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Prop 8 Repeal On 2010&#8242;s Ballot</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/13/no-prop-8-repeal-on-2010s-ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/13/no-prop-8-repeal-on-2010s-ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=2011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news is that the effort to gather enough signatures to put a repeal of Proposition 8 on the ballot for 2010 has fallen short. But the pro same-sex &#8216;marriage&#8217; folks are resolved to bring it to a vote (again) in 2012. I&#8217;m almost disappointed. An effort to repeal Prop 8 just two years after [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/13/no-prop-8-repeal-on-2010s-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr J&#8217;s Becoming Notorious!</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/07/dr-js-becoming-notorious/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/07/dr-js-becoming-notorious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 03:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Roback Morse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tips-Q bills itself as “GLBT News &#38; Commentary &#8211; Neither Lifestyle Nor Agenda”. It’s interesting (sometimes even amusing) to surf the site for a perspective of their views and attitudes. (Be sure to look in the Talking Points drop-down menu at their Fundie to English Dictionary.) Recently they alerted their site’s followers to an article [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/04/07/dr-js-becoming-notorious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olson and Boies’ Double Standard</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/30/olson-and-boies%e2%80%99-double-standard-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/30/olson-and-boies%e2%80%99-double-standard-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8 Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suppose you were involved in a dispute with someone. It could be with anyone over anything&#8230; with a merchant over a warranty for something you had purchased at his store&#8230; or a coworker over a situation at your place of employment&#8230; a spouse over a relationship issue&#8230; or (as in this case) it could be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/30/olson-and-boies%e2%80%99-double-standard-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Language of the California Human Rights Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/22/the-language-of-the-california-human-rights-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/22/the-language-of-the-california-human-rights-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Person Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you go to PersonhoodUSA.com and click on the map of the United States, you’ll see there are now thirty-one states where they are working on putting a Personhood Amendment on the ballot. (Thank you, Kristi Burton!) You can also look at the top of the page and see links to sites where you can [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/22/the-language-of-the-california-human-rights-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>facebook is the gay lobby&#8217;s new target&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/11/facebook-is-the-gay-lobbys-new-target/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/11/facebook-is-the-gay-lobbys-new-target/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, it&#8217;s not that I’m Australian mates (born and raised right here in the good old USA, as a matter of fact) but for some reason the first two times I’ve felt motivated to post on Ruth Institute blog it’s been because of something that was happening ‘down under’ (and both times specifically in Queensland, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/03/11/facebook-is-the-gay-lobbys-new-target/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kids Rights Count</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/02/25/kids-rights-count/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/02/25/kids-rights-count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=1626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article at TheCatholicLeader.com laments that the Parliament of the Australian state of Queensland recently passed a law that extensively liberalized the use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Of particular importance to opponents of the bill (such as KidsRightsCount.org) was the issue of surrogacy, especially as it relates to same-sex parenting. If you go to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2010/02/25/kids-rights-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/13 queries in 0.051 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2010-09-09 04:55:27 -->