<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ruth Institute Blog &#187; leland</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ruthblog.org/author/leland/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ruthblog.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual climate favorable to marriage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:12:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Prop 8 Will Be Back in Court Monday Morning (June 13, 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/06/12/prop-8-will-be-back-in-court-monday-morning-june-13-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/06/12/prop-8-will-be-back-in-court-monday-morning-june-13-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 02:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Prop 8 Trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposition 8&#8242;s sponsors will be in court Monday morning to argue whether Judge Walker&#8217;s decision to overturn Prop 8 should be vacated on the basis that the long term same-sex relationship he is involved in (and was involved in at the time of the Prop 8 trial, but failed to disclose) constitutes a conflict of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/06/12/prop-8-will-be-back-in-court-monday-morning-june-13-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The French Got It Right on Surrogacy</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/07/the-french-got-it-right-on-surrogacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/07/the-french-got-it-right-on-surrogacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surrogate Mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=7044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from Yahoo News: France&#8217;s top court refused Wednesday to allow French citizenship for 10-year-old twin girls born to a surrogate mother in the United States, in a ruling that affirmed France&#8217;s legal ban on surrogacy. In a case straddling international legal rights and bioethics, the Court of Cassation ruled a California county went too far [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/07/the-french-got-it-right-on-surrogacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planned &#8216;Parenthood&#8217; Wants Our BILLIONS, But Don&#8217;t Ask Them What They Do With It</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/05/planned-parenthood-wants-our-billions-but-dont-ask-them-what-they-do-with-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/05/planned-parenthood-wants-our-billions-but-dont-ask-them-what-they-do-with-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington Times has been doing some research into what Planned &#8216;Parenthood&#8217; does with the billions of tax dollars they have received from us over the years, as well as how well they are able (or willing?) to account for how they&#8217;ve been spending our money: Planned Parenthood&#8217;s annual reports show more than $2 billion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/05/planned-parenthood-wants-our-billions-but-dont-ask-them-what-they-do-with-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future Belongs To Those Who Show Up For It&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/02/the-future-belongs-to-those-who-show-up-for-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/02/the-future-belongs-to-those-who-show-up-for-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 05:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Legalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographic Winter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex-selective Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One has to wonder sometimes if Western Civilization is even going to bother showing up for the the future of the world. Well, not the way things are going in America lately, at least not according to recent government data as reported in the LA Times: LA Times: The maternity business has experienced a recession, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/02/the-future-belongs-to-those-who-show-up-for-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-Sex &#8216;Marriage&#8217; Law Cited in Canadian Polygamy Trial</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/01/same-sex-marriage-law-cited-in-canadian-polygamy-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/01/same-sex-marriage-law-cited-in-canadian-polygamy-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Legalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from WinnipegFreePress.com: The last time Canadians had a debate about the definition of marriage, it was over whether gays and lesbians had a constitutional right to marry. In the end, the courts decided they did. Now, as a British Columbia judge weighs whether polygamy should be decriminalized, advocates on both sides of the debate are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/01/same-sex-marriage-law-cited-in-canadian-polygamy-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona Bans &#8216;Telemed&#8217; Abortions</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/01/arizona-bans-telemed-abortions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/01/arizona-bans-telemed-abortions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[from LifeNews.com: HB 2416 bans the practice of abortion via webcam, also known as telemedicine. Considering the well-documented dangers of abortion pills, women should be able to meet in person with a doctor before ingesting a dangerous chemical&#8230; Abortion-via-webcam is just another example of how Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry are concerned with their [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/04/01/arizona-bans-telemed-abortions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suppressing the Christian World View, Step by Totalitarian Step&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/suppressing-the-christian-world-view-step-by-totalitarian-step/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/suppressing-the-christian-world-view-step-by-totalitarian-step/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 04:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Radicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the editors of Mississauga News Magazine are utterly incensed that the Dufferin-Peel Catholic District School Board near Ontario, Canada would not allow a student to form an official Gay/Striaght Alliance club at one of their secondary schools: The nerve! This is a human rights issue and the Catholic board is coming out — [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/suppressing-the-christian-world-view-step-by-totalitarian-step/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One More Reason To Be Wary Of ART</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/one-more-reason-to-be-wary-of-art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/one-more-reason-to-be-wary-of-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 03:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Reproductive Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donor Conceived Persons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invitro Fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surrogate Mothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial reproductive technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invitro fertilization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday there was a segment on NPR titled Taming The Twin Trend From Fertility Treatments. They talked about how various forms of ART have caused an increase in the incidence of twin pregnancies: Twins, once a rarity to marvel over, are now a common part of American culture, thanks in large part to increased use [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/one-more-reason-to-be-wary-of-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company Uses Cells From Abortions to Test Artificial Flavors</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/company-uses-cells-from-abortions-to-test-artificial-flavors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/company-uses-cells-from-abortions-to-test-artificial-flavors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Cell Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pro-life group that monitors the use of cells from babies victimized by abortions is today highlighting a biotech company, Senomyx, which it says produces artificial flavor enhancers using aborted fetal cell lines to test their products. How could this possibly be happening?!!! I don&#8217;t even know what to say&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/company-uses-cells-from-abortions-to-test-artificial-flavors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Same-Sex &#8216;Marriage&#8217; the Sky&#8217;s the Limit</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/after-same-sex-marriage-the-skys-the-limit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/after-same-sex-marriage-the-skys-the-limit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Legalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyamory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Radicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LGBTweekly.com: The Irish edition of tabloid news magazine The Sun recently covered the story of Penny Lawrence, a 28-year-old woman suffering from Genetic Sexual Attraction (GSA) who is now pregnant with her father’s child. If you seriously don&#8217;t think there are folks waiting in the wings for same-sex &#8216;marriage&#8217; to set the legal precedent they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/after-same-sex-marriage-the-skys-the-limit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just Another Day for Dr. J</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/just-another-day-for-dr-j/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/just-another-day-for-dr-j/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 08:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Roback Morse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Legalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today CatholicVote.org published an article that covers a lecture Dr J gave in early February. In fact we already have a thread about it. (Pro-Family Speaker Challenges Students) But apparently people are still writing about her talk, it is a presentation well worth revisiting, and the author of the article very succinctly sums up what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/just-another-day-for-dr-j/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood’s Own Reports: More Funding = More Abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/planned-parenthood%e2%80%99s-own-reports-more-funding-more-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/planned-parenthood%e2%80%99s-own-reports-more-funding-more-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 07:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Right to Life News: PPFA often argues that increased funding will enable them to reduce the numbers of abortion. The problem is their own organizational reports don’t seem to show that. The amount that Planned Parenthood has gotten from federal, state, and local governments has been increasing steadily over the past several years, more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/31/planned-parenthood%e2%80%99s-own-reports-more-funding-more-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Study Shows That Pro-Life Laws Work</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/29/new-study-shows-that-pro-life-laws-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/29/new-study-shows-that-pro-life-laws-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many say they would like abortion to be “safe, legal, and rare”. It can never be made to be truly safe; it should only be legal to save the life of the mother; but at least we can agree on the “rare” part. The study referred to in this article shows us one way that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/29/new-study-shows-that-pro-life-laws-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>April is Abortion Recovery Awareness Month</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/29/april-is-abortion-recovery-awareness-month/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/29/april-is-abortion-recovery-awareness-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At most Pregnancy Centers you&#8217;ll find a (regrettably) thriving Post Abortion Syndrome Support group – and many of the volunteers at the clinic are often members. Those of you who have been hurt by abortion (or know someone who has) will want to read this. For more information, visit Abortion Recovery InterNational&#8217;s websites: www.abortionrecoveryawarenessmonth.org (for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/29/april-is-abortion-recovery-awareness-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion Killed Social Security</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/29/abortion-killed-social-security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/29/abortion-killed-social-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Under-population]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[File this one under “Duh! Ya&#8217; think?” We exterminate a third of the offspring who would have otherwise been supporting us in our old age, and then we wonder why the Social Security system didn&#8217;t work out the way we had planned.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/29/abortion-killed-social-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only One Side of This Debate Has the Right to Freedom of Speech&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/28/only-one-side-of-this-debate-has-the-right-to-freedom-of-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/28/only-one-side-of-this-debate-has-the-right-to-freedom-of-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 01:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Radicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember when our universities were places where civil discourse was sacred? Take a look at this video. Read the article while you&#8217;re at it. And yet the advocates of same-sex &#8216;marriage&#8217; keep assuring us that nobody&#8217;s civil rights will have to be abridged for them to have their way.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/28/only-one-side-of-this-debate-has-the-right-to-freedom-of-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pro-Life Movement is Alive and Well in Spain</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/27/the-pro-life-movement-is-alive-and-well-in-spain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/27/the-pro-life-movement-is-alive-and-well-in-spain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunking MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between 130,000 and 160,000 people demonstrated in central Madrid, Spain, on Saturday against laws that make abortion easier, according to organizers. Why is it that this event was covered only by Christian news websites?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/27/the-pro-life-movement-is-alive-and-well-in-spain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions (Re: Same-Sex &#8216;Marriage&#8217;) That Demand an Answer</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/27/questions-re-same-sex-marriage-that-demand-an-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/27/questions-re-same-sex-marriage-that-demand-an-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve and Cokie Roberts (Yes, the Cokie Roberts of NPR&#8230;) have published a book about how they&#8217;ve made an interfaith marriage work for almost forty-five years. And in my ever so humble opinion they do indeed deserve to be praised and admired for standing so resolutely by their vows – especially in an age when [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/27/questions-re-same-sex-marriage-that-demand-an-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics and&#8230; Planned &#8216;Parenthood&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/10/lies-damned-lies-statistics-and-planned-parenthood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/10/lies-damned-lies-statistics-and-planned-parenthood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunking MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-life Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-life movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JillStanek.com: Julie Rovner, NPR health policy correspondent: Well, the conflict is really that PP keeps its statistics according to the percent of those services that are provided, not according to how many people get what&#8230; Sarah Stoesz from PP kind of misspoke when she said it was 3% of patients who come in get abortions. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/10/lies-damned-lies-statistics-and-planned-parenthood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homosexual Couple Files Complaint Against Dallas Morning News</title>
		<link>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/08/homosexual-couple-files-complaint-against-dallas-morning-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/08/homosexual-couple-files-complaint-against-dallas-morning-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gay lobby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judicial Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual agenda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ruthblog.org/?p=6453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, is this not a full frontal attack on our right to freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and even our freedom of religion, even freedom of thought, no less? Have the advocates of same-sex so-called &#8216;marriage&#8217; not always vowed that would never happen? But are they not now demanding that everyone else (especially [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ruthblog.org/2011/03/08/homosexual-couple-files-complaint-against-dallas-morning-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/12 queries in 0.046 seconds using disk

Served from: www.ruthblog.org @ 2012-02-10 20:13:36 -->
