So Now It’s Going To Be Collusive Litigation, Is It?
Do the words “official duty” mean anything to guys like Barack Obama or Jerry Brown? How about “oath of office”?
But at least we can be certain they know about “collusive litigation”?:
…the Obama Justice Department’s defense of DOMA maintains a pattern that a distinguished scholar has termed “almost like collusive litigation”—that is, where presumed adversaries are actually seeking the same result. The Obama Administration is indeed all but abandoning DOMA—but not in the forthright manner that would result in a real battle in the courts where both sides of the controversy are represented.
State Senator Tom Harman of California’s 35th Senate District introduced Senate Bill 5. The bill officially titled “Attorney General: Defense of Initiative Statutes,” would require the Attorney General to defend against constitutional challenge, at the trial court level or as a respondent or appellant at the court of appeal or the Supreme Court, a constitutional amendment or an initiative statute that has been approved by the voters.
Moreover, SB 5 would authorize the proponents of the constitutional amendment or initiative statute, to defend the amendment or statute in the place of the Attorney General, if he or she is disqualified.
We can always hope someone in the U.S. Congress will take a cue from State Senator Harman, I guess…
You know, for more than forty years now I’ve watched the homosexual agenda being advanced by people who have no qualms whatsoever about employing absolutely any tactic at all to achieve the ends they desire. (commandeer public schools to sexually indoctrinate children… legislate from the bench… engage in gestapo tactics to intimidate their opponents during elections… undermine the Free Exercise clause… engineer collusive litigation… you name it!) Our fellow citizens in the gay lobby would be well advised to be careful about the legal precedents they are setting that could come back to haunt them.
Consider the implications of this dialog from “A Man For All Seasons”:
William Roper: So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!
Sir Thomas More: Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?
William Roper: Yes, I’d cut down every law in England to do that!
Sir Thomas More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned ’round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man’s laws, not God’s! And if you cut them down, and you’re just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety’s sake!
The pendulum always swings, my friends, and the worm always turns. Sooner or later, the methods that some of you are using to force your will on all of society will come back to bite you…